NYSE / Last 4 quarters

ORN earnings call analysis

ORN. AI-assisted transcript summaries focused on management tone, evasions, goalpost moving, catalysts, risks, and data-center exposure.

4 storedAug 9, 2026

Research summary and source transcript

readyAug 9, 2026

ORN's FY2026 Q2 call is best read as a thesis-quality check, not a transcript recap. The upside case is that AI and compute-heavy infrastructure demand are becoming real drivers of customer activity. The key investor question is whether that activity converts into durable revenue, royalties, margins, and cash flow rather than remaining a strong-sounding demand story.

Framework #1 asks what management may know now that the market may not fully recognize for 6-24 months. For ORN, the possible information gradient is whether current demand, backlog, customer activity, or AI/data-center engagement is an early signal of durable conversion rather than a one-quarter narrative. The transcript still needs follow-through in future quarters before that can be treated as proven.

The business engine appears to be demand conversion into revenue at acceptable incremental margins; the fallback needs management's KPIs and historical conversion data to grade it more precisely.

  • Management centered the story on AI, compute, or data-center demand, which is the key thesis variable to verify in future quarters.
  • Backlog and demand visibility were important to the quarter's credibility.
  • Profitability and margin durability should be treated as quality-of-revenue checks, not just headline metrics.
  • Customer breadth is not yet well proven from the transcript.
  • Management's strongest emphasis appears to be around demand momentum and AI/compute-related opportunity; the useful investor question is whether that enthusiasm is backed by conversion and customer economics.

The tone reads constructive but still needs investor skepticism. Management appears to have enough operating evidence to discuss momentum, but the call only becomes high-quality if the numbers support conversion, margins, cash flow, and customer breadth. Local fallback reason: model analysis failed during on-demand transcript rendering: Earnings call analyzer failed with status 403..

  • No clear dodged analyst question was detected by the local fallback; manual review should still check whether Q&A answers quantified conversion, margins, and guidance.
  • There may be a benchmark or metric-framing issue worth manual review, especially around adjusted metrics, timelines, or changed expectations.

Competitive position looks potentially improving, but not proven. Customer activity and AI/compute exposure suggest the company may be in the right demand pools; the missing proof is market-share data, pricing power, win/loss detail, and retention economics.

  • Key figure to verify: The President's 2027 $1.5 trillion defense budget proposal made its way to the House last week, but has yet to clear legislative hurdles in the Senate before reconciliation can begin.
  • Key figure to verify: Overall, confidence in the long-term outlook across our business remains robust and our Pursuit Pipeline has grown to approximately $27 billion with almost $1.6 billion in projects quoted awaiting award.
  • Key figure to verify: Our win rate during the quarter was well above industry average and we were pleased to record over $275 million in bookings in the quarter.
  • Key figure to verify: representing a 1.25 times book to bill and bringing backlog at quarter end to $722 million.
  • Key figure to verify: Our concrete business posted excellent results, reporting over 30% top line and 45% adjusted EBITDA growth in the quarter, benefiting from expansion into site civil services, favorable utilization, and solid execution.
  • The quarter appears to be moving from story to evidence: operating momentum is showing up in revenue, royalties, or backlog rather than only in management narrative.
  • The customer proof is incomplete; investors should look for named wins, renewal detail, and cohort-level expansion before underwriting durability.
  • AI and data-center exposure look strategically relevant rather than cosmetic, because management ties demand to compute-heavy end markets instead of treating it as a generic buzzword.
  • Profitability is a quality signal here, but the investment value depends on whether margins can hold as mix, hiring, and customer concentration evolve.
  • The main open question is conversion: AI or data-center engagement has to turn into recurring royalties, cash flow, and repeatable design wins before it deserves full credit in valuation.
  • Backlog lowers some demand uncertainty, but investors still need timing, cancellation risk, concentration, and conversion economics before treating it as de-risked revenue.
  • Margin strength is not itself a risk; the risk is whether that margin level is sustainable if revenue mix, investment spend, or pricing changes.
  • There is enough downside language in the transcript to require follow-up on execution, timing, or disclosure quality rather than reading the quarter as fully clean.

The data-center angle appears investable but still needs sizing. The call connects the company to AI or compute-heavy infrastructure demand, which is directionally positive, but the thesis should depend on how much of that activity becomes durable revenue, royalties, and cash conversion rather than on thematic exposure alone.

  • How much of the AI or data-center engagement converts into recurring royalties or repeat revenue within the next four quarters?
  • What portion of backlog is cancellable, delayed, concentrated, or dependent on a small number of customers?
  • Can current margin levels persist as mix, headcount, and product investment change?
  • Did management quantify cash conversion and operating leverage, or only highlight revenue and demand?
  • Are customer wins broad enough to imply share gain rather than a few isolated projects?

FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript

33,530 chars

NYSE:ORN Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript Generated on 8/9/2026 Operator | Conference Operator: Good day, and welcome to the Orion Group Holdings second quarter 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on a touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star, and then two. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Margaret Boyce, Investor Relations for Orion. Please go ahead, ma'am.

Margaret Boyce | Investor Relations

Thank you, Operator, and thank you all for joining us today to discuss Orion Group Holdings' second quarter 2026 financial results. We issued our earnings release after market last night. It's available in the Investor Relations section of our website at oriangroupholdingsinc.com. I'm here today with Travis Boone, Chief Executive Officer of Orion, and Alison Vasquez, Chief Financial Officer. On today's call, management will provide prepared remarks, and then we'll open up the call for your questions. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's comments will include forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as will, be, intend, believe, expect, anticipate, or other comparable words and phrases. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Our actual financial condition and results of operations may vary materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Discussion of the factors that could cause our results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are contained in our SEC filings, including our reports on Form 10-Q and 10-K. With that, I'll turn the call over to Travis. Travis, please go ahead.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Margaret, and thank you all for joining our call today. I want to start by acknowledging that our results for the quarter were not in line with your expectations or ours due to some client delays in our marine business. It is a timing issue, not a performance or operational issue. These delays are now behind us. We often talk about construction being a lumpy business. This quarter is a good example. Things are going well. Our people are engaged, and we are performing. If not for these delays, results would have been right in line with our expectations. We will give more details on the quarter shortly. Bigger picture, our win rate continues to be high, our concrete business is operating at historic levels, we had a strong quarter of bookings, our pipeline continues to grow, and our story remains unchanged. We have a historically strong marine construction market opening in front of us, and we remain confident in our ability to grow over the coming years. With multiple new marine projects kicking off, we expect the back half of 2026 to be strong and we are optimistic about 2027 as well. Turning to the market outlook, today our business is benefiting from powerful long-term themes that include significant long-duration capital investments, spanning defense infrastructure, port and transportation infrastructure, Energy, Data Centers, Healthcare, and Commercial Construction. For marine, we are well positioned on the doorstep of a marine infrastructure investment mega cycle that enables continued U.S. economic competitiveness, energy security, supply chain resilience, and national defense. These priorities are driving increased investment in larger, more technically complex marine infrastructure projects that require specialized marine construction capabilities Highly Skilled Workforce, and Fit for Purpose Equipment, precisely the type of projects Orion is increasingly pursuing, winning, and executing. The President's 2027 $1.5 trillion defense budget proposal made its way to the House last week, but has yet to clear legislative hurdles in the Senate before reconciliation can begin. While spending levels will be debated, investments across naval infrastructure modernization Indo-Pacific Command Strength, and Logistics and Port Resilience continue to be priorities with solid bipartisan support. We are closely monitoring the U.S. defense budget as we look ahead to programs that will catalyze our long-term growth. On to the concrete market outlook, where momentum remains very strong. We are benefiting from the build-out of physical infrastructure supporting the investment in AI, cloud computing, and domestic manufacturing. As our clients seek to streamline project coordination, compress schedules, and increase execution certainty, many are directly engaging with our team earlier in the project lifecycle to advise on design and execution. Additionally, our expansion into site civil services is going very well, and we are seeing increased opportunities to pursue this scope on a broader set of projects. Overall, confidence in the long-term outlook across our business remains robust and our Pursuit Pipeline has grown to approximately $27 billion with almost $1.6 billion in projects quoted awaiting award. As you may recall, this number was sitting right around a billion at the beginning of the year and reflects our nearest term award opportunities. Our win rate during the quarter was well above industry average and we were pleased to record over $275 million in bookings in the quarter. representing a 1.25 times book to bill and bringing backlog at quarter end to $722 million. Bookings across our marine and concrete businesses reinforce our compelling competitive position and attractive in markets and include a large port terminal expansion project in Alabama, a dredging project in the U.S. Virgin Islands, a couple of nice jetty wins from Pacific Rock and Dredge, a.k.a. McCamus, who we acquired in February, and additional phases on multiple data center projects. With a growing opportunity pipeline, expanded capabilities and an outstanding team delivering projects that matter, our conviction in Orion's long-term growth trajectory is well intact. Onto some high-level comments on the second quarter results. Our results reflect the growth of concrete alongside the temporary softness in marine caused primarily by slower than expected project starts and elongated award cycles. Our concrete business posted excellent results, reporting over 30% top line and 45% adjusted EBITDA growth in the quarter, benefiting from expansion into site civil services, favorable utilization, and solid execution. Marine top line and profitability were down primarily due to the timing of project awards, startups, and completions, and we have reset our four-year 2026 guidance to reflect this timing shift. Today we have very good visibility into the remainder of the year with nearly 90% marine work under contract and continued concrete momentum to achieve our updated guidance. Before handing it over, I'd like to take a moment to give a shout out to our Pacific Rock and Dredge team who are prominently featured in the new documentary movie, Taming the Mouth. We had the honor of attending the premiere this past weekend and it is definitely worth seeing. The documentary is a fascinating piece on the treacherous mouth of the Columbia River where it meets the Pacific Ocean, an area commonly known as the graveyard of the Pacific. The movie highlights McCamus's recently completed reconstruction of the massive jetty and breakwater system to calm the turbulent seas. Starting August 4th, you can stream it on Apple TV or Amazon Prime. I'll now turn it over to Alison to discuss the details.

Alison. Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Travis. In the second quarter, we generated revenue of $222 million, an 8% increase from the second quarter of last year. As Travis discussed, concrete delivered another strong quarter, while the timing of marine awards and project startups weighed on our results. Gross profit was $23 million, down $3 million from last year, due primarily to lower marine volume and equipment utilization. Specifically, we had several projects where our team's mobilization was delayed primarily due to client-related issues such as site readiness and timing of delivery of client-provided materials. When marine productivity slows, we sometimes get a double whammy in the lost project profitability along with the correlated lower equipment utilization, and this definitely impacted this quarter's gross profit. These projects are now all in full swing and we expect good productivity through the second half of the year. The decline in marine gross profit was partially offset by nice volume and favorable project execution within our concrete segment. GAAP loss for the quarter was $4.1 million compared to GAAP net income of $0.8 million in the second quarter of last year, which was caused primarily by reduced volume in our marine business, increased depreciation and amortization, and an increase in GAAP taxes associated with VA adjustments. Second quarter adjusted EBITDA was 7.9 million and adjusted EPS was two cents and compared to 11 million or seven cents per share in the prior year quarter. Our balance sheet is in good shape with net leverage of 2.3 times providing us with financial flexibility to support our strategic priorities. As Travis mentioned, we have reset our full year guidance to reflect the timing shifts in our marine segment. Revised 2026 annual guidance is revenue in the range of $900 million to $950 million, unchanged. Adjusted EBITDA in the range of $50 million to $54 million, representing 15% growth over 2025 actual results at the midpoint. Adjusted EPS in the range of $0.23 to $0.30, representing 6% growth over 2025 actual results at the midpoint. and capital expenditures in the range of 25 million to 35 million, which remains unchanged. With that, I'll turn it back to Travis to wrap it up.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Alison. Orion is embarking on a pivotal chapter. We've spent the last few years refining our capabilities, expanding our geographic footprint, recruiting and upscaling our people and embedding a culture of teamwork, safety, delivery and integrity throughout the organization. We've made these investments intentionally to seize on the vast market opportunities taking shape in the market. While timing can affect individual quarters, our confidence in where this business is headed is stronger than ever. We are on track and pleased with our business and our strategic direction. With that, I'll hand it back over to the operator to open it up for Q&A.

Operator | Conference Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star and then two. In the interest of time, please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. We will now pause momentarily to assemble the roster. The first question will come from Aaron Spichala with Craig Hallam.

Please go ahead. Aaron Spichala | Analyst at Craig Hallam

Yeah, good morning, Travis and Alison. Thanks for taking the questions.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Morning, Aaron.

Aaron Spichala | Analyst at Craig Hallam

You know, first for us, can you just maybe talk about, you know, guidance implies a pickup in margins in the back half and just can you speak to the confidence in achieving those and just broadly some of the opportunities you see for margin expansion moving forward?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Sure. We have some of those projects that caused the delays in the second quarter are mobilized and kicking off. We have 90% of our marine backlog for the back half of the year under contract. And 80% of our business overall is under contract for the back half of the year. And we feel really good about our ability to deliver, recognizing that it's a big jump up from where we were in the first half. But when we get the All the marine assets utilized and everybody operating, it's going to make a big jump. So we're confident in the back half being a big step up.

Aaron Spichala | Analyst at Craig Hallam

All right. Thanks for that. And then, you know, just good to see the orders starting to pick up. Has that carried over, you know, into July and just, again, maybe kind of talk about what you're seeing in the market as you go to bid on on the margin side of things as well.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, we've seen general continued wins in July. Nothing specifically right home about it. We would have talked about it, but it's been a good group of wins in the first month of the third quarter. As far as pricing, it's generally been stayed relatively steady, nothing Nothing heading in the wrong direction. So that's a good thing. And we're confident about things. Our win rate, just to reiterate, our win rate has stepped up a bit. So that's been good. And that was stepped up in the second quarter from the first quarter, just slightly in the marine business. So that's good. And hopefully we expect that to continue.

Aaron Spichala | Analyst at Craig Hallam

Great. Thanks for taking the next questions.

I'll turn it over. Operator | Conference Operator

The next question will come from Brent Thielman with Oppenheimer.

Please go ahead. Brent Thielman | Analyst at Oppenheimer

Hey, thanks. Morning, Travis and Alison. Morning, Brent. I guess just on the concrete business, it seems like the backlog there is a little misleading relative to what you're seeing within the end markets. It's been under pressure here for a few quarters now. Could you just sort of level set us on your expectations for growth for the segment into the second half?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

And you said concrete, correct?

Brent Thielman | Analyst at Oppenheimer

Yeah, on the concrete segment.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, the concrete, it's tough to tell from pipeline or backlog with concrete what's happening because things happen so fast. You know, in marine, we see it coming for a long time. And then, you know, there tends to be quite a few delays, et cetera. There's a longer kind of lead up to actually getting to work with concrete. oftentimes we hear about an opportunity and we're working on it two weeks later, three weeks later. It's a really quick turnaround. And so not seeing it in the backlog is not an indication of our expectations of what it's going to be just because it comes in quick and burns fast. We've got over a billion dollars in our concrete business, outstanding bids, outstanding. So quite a bit of work we're waiting to hear on and feel really good about our concrete business. I mean, I was on a bid review this morning for a large project. There's a lot of things happening.

Brent Thielman | Analyst at Oppenheimer

Okay, excellent. And then Travis, you did express confidence in the growth opportunities in the 2027. Obviously a lot going on in both business groups. Maybe you just kind of highlight some of the factors in particular that you're seeing. I know there's some larger naval related programs out there you're pursuing. Should we expect to see kind of a build in the book of the business through the second half as we go into 2027?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

That's what we expect, albeit there's been a lot of slides and delays and opportunities that we think they're going to happen and they slide. So I do want to caveat it with our expectations versus reality sometimes is a little different just based on clients pushing procurements and awards and things like that. But our pipeline is different. very strong for the rest of this year as well as the first half of next year. So we're feeling really good about our ability to continue to grow the business and build what we've been talking about for a long time.

Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and I'll just add to that that you mentioned the naval side, Brent, that the pipeline and the opportunities that we're pursuing are quite balanced across the Department of Defense or Department of War is a piece of it. Just in this quarter alone, from a second quarter perspective, the largest project that we won was a large port modernization project in Alabama. We're seeing a nice balance between defense, between port modernization, between commercial and energy, oil and gas, chemical clients, really looking to make investments in a more regulatory light environment while they can press forward. And so we're seeing good momentum really across a number of different fronts. So I wouldn't pigeonhole it back into just naval opportunities. Not that you would, but.

Brent Thielman | Analyst at Oppenheimer

Okay. Thank you.

I'll pass it on. Operator | Conference Operator

The next question will come from Min Cho with Texas Capital Securities.

Please go ahead. Min Cho | Analyst at Texas Capital Securities

Great. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. The first question has to do with the concrete margins. They were obviously below 1Q. I know that was a high watermark for you, especially given the weather. But are the 2Q margins a good run rate for the rest of the year, or what could lead to some expansion there?

Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

So the 2Q margins came in right in line with what we expected, right? I mean, they're just a I mean, between 5.5% and 6%. And that's generally what we pencil out for them for the year. Do they have opportunities to bump that up to the extent that they can have additional capacity flow through that? They do. I would say from a second quarter perspective, we did see... A downtick from the first quarter really associated with just some weather and starts and stops and things that happen with that. But from a momentum perspective, we're seeing good momentum in that business overall, good pipeline, as Travis mentioned earlier, of opportunities that we're waiting on, and really strong backlog as we enter into the third quarter. So the concrete team is busy and out and executing. And I don't see any issues with that team really hitting close to that 6% margin from a full year perspective, which is what we're really targeting for that business.

Min Cho | Analyst at Texas Capital Securities

Great. Thank you. And then can you just tell us what percentage of concrete revenue and concrete backlog is currently from data centers?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

That's roughly 50% this quarter for data centers on concrete, the revenue this quarter.

Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and I would say the pipeline probably is in line with that, maybe a little bit slightly higher.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Potentially, yeah. And just as a reminder, it was 40% in the first quarter.

Min Cho | Analyst at Texas Capital Securities

Great. Thank you. And if I can just slip one quick one in here. You know, your pipeline of opportunities has increased, you know, to $27 billion now up from the last quarter. Can you talk about any notable trends that you're seeing? What was kind of added? Yeah, just any additional information about the growth in the pipeline?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Alison's point about kind of a good balance of Department of War type, whether it's Corps of Engineers or Army pursuits, as well as private industry energy type work as well as state and local agencies, whether it be ports or DOTs. It's pretty well balanced. We are seeing continued shifts to larger, more complex projects as well as shifts toward more alternative delivery, meaning Not a kind of traditional design bid build, but more of the, you know, a whole variety of different types of alternative delivery, be it design builds or progressive design build or CMGC or all the different other nomenclatures that are used for different delivery models. So we've seen an uptick in those as well. And that's You know, typically with the larger, more complex projects, they typically have some sort of alternative delivery component, and that's what we're seeing more and more of those.

Min Cho | Analyst at Texas Capital Securities

Got it. Great. Thank you so much.

Thank you. Operator | Conference Operator

The next question will come from Tomo Sano with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning, everyone.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Morning, Tomo.

Morning. Tomo Sano | Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Thank you for taking my questions. You've said marine phasing and high visibility into the back half are understood. Where is equipment utilization today? What utilization levels are you targeting in the second half? Could you quantify margin sensitivity to utilization, please?

Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

We don't talk specifically about what the utilization percentages are, but I would say that they were below expectation in the second quarter. As we think about what we see in the third quarter and into the fourth quarter, as some of those projects have ramped and are ramping in as we kick off new work, the equipment plans are quite high in terms of the equipment utilization as well as the labor utilization. And so I would say that we have good line of sight into not only just the expansion of the revenue and the growth into the back half, But a lot of that profitability and that revenue growth will have opportunities to bring that all the way to the bottom line because the equipment cost is the equipment cost, whether you're using it or you're not using it. And as we grow revenue and we're using our own fleet, you have more of those dollars fall to the bottom line, which gives us opportunities to expand margins in a more meaningful way in our marine business.

Tomo Sano | Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Thank you, and one more follow-up on McCamey's. How should we expect McCamey's integration to contribute in a back half to utilization wins and profitability, and are there any areas integration is behind the plan or costing more than expected?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

We feel really good about the integration that's happened so far. The team has continued to win projects. and their work window just kind of opened up this month. So they're off to the races, so to speak, with quite a few projects underway currently and will be busy for the rest of the year. So I would say they would contribute much more heavily to the back half of the year, which that's kind of going to be the norm, if you will, for that business. Back half of the year waited for them just because of the work windows in their area. but they'll be highly utilized and very busy for the back half of the year.

Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and I'll pick up on the integration question just with regard to how the integration is going. The integration is going very well. They're fully transitioned over to our project controls, financial, IT systems, so that is going well. And they contributed positively both from a top line perspective and then also from an EBITDA perspective and were accretive to EBITDA margins during the quarter. So we feel good about that. But as Travis said, their work window really is late June or early July through February. So our expectation is that through the back half of the year that that will ramp up quite significantly.

Tomo Sano | Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Thank you, Travis, Alison.

That's all. Operator | Conference Operator

Thanks, Samuel. Thanks. The next question will come from Jerry Sweeney with Roth Capital.

Please go ahead. Jerry Sweeney | Analyst at Roth Capital

Good morning, Allison and Travis. Thanks for taking my call. A lot of questions already answered, but just maybe another question on McCamas. Obviously, it brings a unique skill set to Orion. I'm just wondering the opportunity to sort of expand that skill set around jetties, et cetera, maybe to other operating areas within your footprint and the opportunity there longer term.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, definitely, Jerry. We've been... tapping into their expertise to look at projects elsewhere across the business into other geographies and bringing their expertise onto existing projects as well to provide kind of value and efficiencies to projects we already had underway. So they provided a lot of value already, and we expect that to continue as we expand their capability set across the geography.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst at Roth Capital

Got it. And then one question on concrete. Obviously, you mentioned that you get brought into these projects very close to – there's not a whole lot of lead time between you getting involved and sort of in-work starting. But with these concrete or even data center projects, these projects, their permanent site selection ground has already been cleared. So these projects are front and center projects. – they're not going to be canceled or anything like that. You have a clear sight as to the opportunity right in front of you in terms of – Yeah, that's right, Jerry.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

By the time they hit our desk, they're full go mode, which is why it's typically a pretty short time between when we find out until we're working. I mean – I mentioned a bid review I was on this morning. We heard about that job early last week and it'll, you know, final numbers go in today and we'll be working within a month. And it's a large project, right? So it's a really quick turnaround on these things and they are very much full go mode by the time we get them. So there's a highly unlikely that they get canceled at that point.

Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and the other thing that I would say that gives us confidence in the longer-term outlook for the data centers, two things. The first is, as we look across the ecosystem and the landscape, we see the long lead time items and the backlog of those companies that have those long lead time items, whether it be the servers or the racks or the electricians, and we see that the backlog for those types of companies is multi-year. So our expectation, because we are not long lead time, we are a critical path, But we have a much shorter window. It gives us a greater window of visibility into what our own path looks like. So a lot of times permitting is not front and center. We don't know because a lot of those things are very secretive for the data centers, which is why we hear about them a week or a month before we really are starting to bid in seriousness. But as we look across the ecosystem, we see that others who do have those long lead time items have a multi-year visibility into that, which gives us confidence that also our concrete business, our site civil services, which are taking off, that those businesses also will continue to be vibrant for the foreseeable future. The other thing I'd point out is because of our credentials in this space We are a known commodity, like we are a known player. We are known for delivery. We are known for getting things done on time and on schedule and for working collaboratively across in this critical path item. And it gives us the opportunity to really focus on Those more premier clients and not the speculative developers and things. So that also really prioritizes where we sit in the stack and the types of opportunities that we see over the longer term, even if we don't see those with six or 12 or 18. We do have those relationships and the capabilities and credentials to give us confidence that this is a work stream that will continue for us for the foreseeable future.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst at Roth Capital

That's helpful. Essentially, it's also fair to say you're working on projects or data center projects that were planned two years ago.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

That's right.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst at Roth Capital

You're working on projects that were just at the beginning front end of the AI sort of investment cycle.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

That's right.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst at Roth Capital

Okay, yeah, all right. If I could flip one more in, I probably will at the end of the line anyhow. Just a little bit of detail on sites of all services. You know, it's something you brought up in expanding and maybe just what's going on there and what's the opportunity for you?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, that's something that we started, Jerry, late last year, as you recall. And that's been, we've seen that going really well. The general contractors we work with and to some extent the owners that we work with are, they appreciate that we're doing, you know, site civil and the concrete. And that's a good value proposition for them. And it's been, you know, we're only, you know, two and a half quarters or so but what we've seen is a really good performance by the team and a really strong embrace of what we're doing by our teaming partners. So it's going very well. And lots of action and opportunity that we're are actively pursuing currently.

Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

And it absolutely simplifies execution for us and maybe more importantly for our clients because they have one place to go to and we can resolve our issues, whatever issues we may encounter, we can resolve internally. So it really de-risks execution, so it's something that's quite attractive.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst at Roth Capital

Got it. I appreciate it. Thanks for your time this morning. Thanks, Jared.

Operator | Conference Operator

Thank you. The next question will come from Laura Maher with B. Reilly Securities.

Please go ahead. Laura Maher | Analyst at B. Riley Securities

Hi, good morning, Travis and Alison. Thanks for taking the question. Good morning, Laura. My first question is on concrete. So the book-to-bill was roughly 9.3 times this quarter. Given the 6- to 12-month project duration, how should we think about the booking cadence?

Alison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

I think the bookings were – this was the first quarter actually in quite a while where the bookings have been – or the book to bill has been less than one time. But I see that more as an episodic item and a timing item. I don't see any issue with the bookings environment in concrete at all. I think it is purely a timing issue in terms of when awards – I mean, we just got a big award in July that – could have come in June, but just timing perspective fluctuated that. So I don't see any issues in that area at all.

Laura Maher | Analyst at B. Riley Securities

Okay, thanks. And then my second question, are you seeing the same contract term improvements the broader heavy civil market is seeing, specifically upfront mobilization payments and owner-funded escalation provisions? And if so, is that showing up in marine or concrete or both?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Good question. So we always are working on trying to get upfront mobilization on our projects, be it concrete or marine, and it depends on the client and things like the contract terms. For example, for the federal government, there's little to no negotiation on contract terms with the federal government. Having said that, on the concrete business, we're not working for the federal government, and so we're able to negotiate terms often. As far as escalation goes, for certain items, we were able to get escalation for things like, which maybe this is where you're headed, but fuel obviously is a a concern on all of our business for the cost of diesel having a lot of variability in the last few months and kind of continued concern over long-term prices for diesel. We do often either hedge that, lock it in, or we build a large or we build a contingency pool into our bid to cover higher diesel prices.

Laura Maher | Analyst at B. Riley Securities

Thanks, Travis. Thanks, Alison.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator | Conference Operator

This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Travis Boone, CEO, for any closing remarks.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thank you. Just quick kind of recap of our key messages through the call. I would say, you know, we started with this is a timing issue, not a Not a demand issue. This is all about timing of getting started on contracts. Our end markets are very strong. We're winning at or above historical rates and definitely above industry average. And our confidence in the long-term strategy is very high. And as I mentioned earlier, our marine business, we have 90% of the work for the back half of the year under contract. and 80% overall for the company. So we're feeling good about things despite how the numbers came in in the second quarter, but we're feeling good about where we are and what we're doing. We appreciate all of our employees who are working so hard every day to deliver the business and thanks to our shareholders for believing in our story.

Thank you. Operator | Conference Operator

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect jsPDF 3.0.3 D:20260809225326-00'00'

Research summary and source transcript

readyJun 10, 2026

Orion Group Holdings delivered a solid Q1 2026 with 15% revenue growth and strong concrete segment performance, driven by data center exposure and backlog growth. The company reaffirmed full-year guidance despite a strong start, citing conservative assumptions and marine segment timing. Management highlighted a $24 billion pursuit pipeline evenly distributed across 2026-2028+, with recent bookings momentum extending into April. The concrete segment benefited from strong execution and favorable weather, while marine faced margin pressure due to project phasing.

Management knows today that the $24 billion pursuit pipeline is evenly distributed across 2026 ($8B), 2027 ($8B), and 2028+ ($8B), with recent bookings momentum yielding over $200 million in new work not yet in backlog (including a $100M port renovation, $40M dredging, and $24M data center project) as of April. This forward visibility into near-term conversion of pipeline to backlog and revenue is not yet reflected in market expectations, which likely assume a more linear or back-end loaded conversion. The market may not fully appreciate the immediacy of this conversion tailwind over the next 6-12 months, particularly given the emphasis on marine-weighted recent awards and the reaffirmed guidance despite strong early performance.

Backlog conversion, pursuit pipeline execution, and data center-driven concrete demand.

  • Data center growth as a primary driver for concrete segment
  • Strong pursuit pipeline and bookings momentum
  • Marine segment timing and project phasing impacts
  • Conservative guidance approach and under-promise/over-deliver philosophy
  • Backlog growth and conversion to revenue
  • Macro drivers: defense spending, energy security, reshoring
  • Concrete segment's 1.1x book-to-bill ratio and 'firing on all cylinders' characterization
  • Data centers accounting for ~40% of concrete revenues in Q1
  • Over $200 million in new work awarded post-quarter (April) not yet in backlog
  • Highlighting J.E. McCamus team's role in high-value pursuits and backlog building
  • Emphasis on 'outstanding productivity, execution, and momentum' in concrete

Management exhibited a direct, confident, and credible tone throughout the call. Executives provided specific, evidence-backed responses to questions, citing concrete examples of projects, bookings, and pipeline details. While maintaining a conservative stance on guidance, they expressed genuine enthusiasm about operational momentum and backlog quality without overstating prospects. There was no defensiveness or vagueness; instead, they balanced optimism with discipline, reinforcing trust through transparency about segment changes, phasing impacts, and capital allocation priorities.

  • There may be at least one Q&A answer that needs manual review for a possible dodge or lack of numerical follow-through.
  • There may be a benchmark or metric-framing issue worth manual review, especially around adjusted metrics, timelines, or changed expectations.

Orion appears to be winning competitively, particularly in the concrete segment where it has established a strong position as a go-to provider for data center and industrial infrastructure, citing over 50 data centers built and a 'seat at the table' in early conversations. The company differentiates through execution discipline, backlog quality, and strategic positioning in defense-linked marine work. While not claiming exclusivity, the depth of experience and pipeline visibility suggest a leading niche position in high-barrier, infrastructure-intensive markets.

  • Q1 2026 revenue: $216 million (15% YoY growth)
  • Q1 2026 adjusted EBITDA: $8.7 million (7% YoY growth)
  • Q1 2026 adjusted EPS: $0.05
  • Backlog at quarter end: $668 million (including ~$220M in new awards/change orders)
  • Pursuit pipeline: $24 billion (evenly split: $8B 2026, $8B 2027, $8B 2028+)
  • Post-quarter bookings (April): over $200M in new work not yet in backlog
  • Conversion of post-Q1 bookings (>$200M) into backlog and revenue in Q2/Q3
  • Continued data center investment by hyperscalers driving concrete demand
  • Potential acceleration of defense and port modernization projects from FY2027 budget
  • Marine segment recovery as new projects ramp up post-phasing
  • Leveraging backlog and pipeline to support second-half weighted guidance
  • Marine segment margin volatility due to project phasing and timing
  • Dependence on timely conversion of pursuit pipeline to backlog and revenue
  • Potential delays in federal defense spending despite budget proposals
  • Weather sensitivity in concrete segment despite Q1 benefit
  • Execution risk in scaling operations to meet backlog and pipeline demands

Data centers are a direct and material driver of Orion's concrete segment, accounting for approximately 40% of concrete revenues in Q1 2026. Management explicitly states that data center development remains a 'primary pillar' and 'central driver of profitable growth' for the concrete business going forward, supported by strong backlog and pipeline composition. This is not speculative; it is a confirmed, current revenue contributor with clear linkage to hyperscaler investment and greenlighting activity. There is no indication of indirect or tangential exposure—data center work is a core, intentional focus of the concrete segment's strategy.

  • What is the expected conversion rate of the $8B 2026 pursuit pipeline into backlog and revenue over the next 3-6 months?
  • How much of the post-Q1 $200M+ in new awards is expected to move into backlog by Q2 end, and what is the anticipated revenue recognition timeline?
  • What specific drivers are expected to drive marine segment margin recovery in H2 2026, and what is the timeline for improvement?
  • Beyond the 40% concrete revenue contribution, what is the trend in data center-related backlog and pipeline as a percentage of total concrete opportunities?
  • How does management assess the sustainability of concrete segment margins at current levels, excluding weather benefits, and what levers exist for further expansion?
  • What portion of the $24B pipeline is tied to defense, energy/petrochem, and data center end markets, and how are these weighted by expected timing?

FY2026 Q1 earnings call transcript

30,998 chars

NYSE:ORN Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript Generated on 6/6/2026 Operator | Conference Operator: Good day, and welcome to the Orion Group Holdings First Quarter 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on a touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star, and then two. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Margaret Boyce, Investor Relations for Orion. Please go ahead, ma'am.

Margaret Boyce | Investor Relations, Orion Group Holdings

Thank you, Operator, and thank you all for joining us today to discuss Orion Group Holdings' first quarter 2026 financial results. We issued our earnings release after market last night. It's available in the Investor Relations section of our website at oriangrupholdingsinc.com. I'm here today with Travis Boone, Chief Executive Officer of Orion, and Allison Vasquez, Chief Financial Officer. On today's call, management will provide prepared remarks, and then we'll open up the call for your questions. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's comments will include forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as will, be, intend, believe, expect, anticipate, or other comparable words and phrases. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Our actual financial condition and results of operations may vary materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Discussion of the factors that could cause our results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are contained in our SEC filings, including our reports on Form 10Q and 10K. With that, I'll turn the call over to Travis. Travis, please go ahead.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Margaret, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss our first quarter 2026 results. We delivered a solid start to the year, supported by disciplined operational performance and a healthy $24 billion pipeline of opportunities. This translated into top and bottom line growth and good cash flow generation. Our teams continue to execute at high level, positioning us well for the remainder of 2026. In our marine segment, demand for mission-critical maritime infrastructure continues to build, particularly across defense and port modernization projects. With the Iran conflict and disruption of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, American naval superiority and domestic energy and petrochem security are front and center. These are meaningful drivers of public and private maritime buildouts that Orion is well positioned for. On another note related to the conflict in the Middle East, You may have heard that the administration paused the Jones Act related to the disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. This is a temporary pause specifically related to the transportation of bulk petroleum and fertilizer products. Previous administrations have made similar actions related to emergencies or disasters. While this limited pause of the Jones Act does not impact our business, we are strongly opposed to any and all Jones Act modifications. It does not align with the America First approach the administration has so publicly promoted, and this action has had little to no impact on reducing fuel prices in the United States. The President's 2027 budget proposal released earlier this month includes a $1.5 trillion defense budget, a historic increase to fund the expansion and modernization of U.S. shipyards, dry docks, and waterfront infrastructure, alongside expanding investment in maritime security and uninterrupted global transportation lanes. This budget prioritizes investment in hard assets tied to US national security, a central theme to Orion's long range growth outlook. Our commercial clients are signaling a growing need for investments that increase energy security and supply diversification, particularly in North America. Buoyed by elevated product prices that support investment economics, we're seeing an acceleration of early work to support energy, chemical and petrochemical projects that include meaningful marine infrastructure to increase export capacity. With the addition of J.E. McCamus in February and continued investment in our people and fleet, our team is well positioned to deliver the maritime infrastructure projects critical to our national defense strategy and commercial resilience. Turning to concrete, this team delivered a fantastic quarter across all key metrics with strong revenue and impressive adjusted EBITDA expansion. Registering a 1.1 times book to bill in the quarter and executing with excellence, concrete is firing on all cylinders. Data center development continues to be a primary pillar for this business. Investment by hyperscalers and greenlining of projects continues to advance at a very brisk pace. In the quarter, data centers accounted for around 40% of concrete revenues. And with the current composition of backlog and pipeline, we believe data centers will continue to be a central driver of profitable growth for our concrete segment going forward. We also continue to see growing opportunities across our other sectors, including advanced manufacturing, transportation, and cold storage. Investments in these areas are driven by reshoring of manufacturing around long-term domestic production strategies, increasing demand for expanded distribution and fulfillment networks, and a favorable regulatory environment. With our recent expansion into site civil, earthwork, and underground utilities, we are seeing the size and scale of concrete pursuits and awards increase while also enhancing execution certainty and control for our clients and our own delivery teams. All in all, an outstanding quarter of bookings, execution, and teamwork for our concrete team. Our backlog is growing and our pursuit pipeline remains healthy with broad-based opportunities across both segments, as we move through the year. Our $24 billion pursuit pipeline is currently evenly distributed over time with roughly $8 billion in opportunities for 2026, $8 billion in 2027, and $8 billion in 2028 and beyond. At the end of the quarter, backlog stood at $668 million and included almost $220 million in new awards and change orders booked in the quarter. Representative awards included a couple of mid-sized port modernization and dredging projects, a bridge project for an Army base, a couple of good winds for the McCamas team, and a nice mix of concrete projects. We've continued the bookings momentum into April and have been awarded well over $200 million in new work that is not yet under contract, so it is not in our backlog, including a $100 million port renovation project, a $40 million dredging project, and a $24 million data center project. These new awards set us up nicely for a strong second quarter. With growing backlog and a robust pipeline, we are pleased to reaffirm our four-year 2026 guidance. I'll now turn it over to Allison to discuss our financials. Allison?

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Travis. We're pleased to report first quarter revenue of $216 million, gap net income of $4.7 million, adjusted EBITDA of 8.7 million, and adjusted EPS of 5 cents per share. As compared to the first quarter of 2025, these results represent a 15% growth in revenue, 7% growth in adjusted EBITDA attributable to strong momentum and expansion of services in our concrete segment, and solid, consistent, predictable project execution across the company. Before turning to segment performance, I want to briefly highlight a change to our segment reporting this quarter. We have revised our presentation to begin reporting three segments, marine, concrete, and corporate. We believe this disaggregation of corporate out of the results of marine and concrete will provide greater transparency into the underlying financial performance of each segment and is much more consistent with how we manage the business. Prior results have been recast to conform to the current presentation, and we've included a full recast of FY 2025 in our investor presentation posted on our website. Our marine segment reported revenue of $110 million and adjusted EBITDA of $12 million, representing an 11% margin, compared to $127 million in revenue and adjusted EBITDA of $17 million in the first quarter of 2025. These decreases were primarily due to the ramp down of several large projects and early starts on new projects kicking off. Our concrete business had a standout first quarter, as Travis talked about, reporting revenue of $106 million and adjusted EBITDA of $8.6 million, representing an 8% margin, as compared to revenue of $61.5 million and adjusted EBITDA of $2.8 million in the prior year quarter. These results represent a high watermark for both revenue and adjusted EBITDA, and are the direct result of outstanding productivity, execution, and momentum. We also benefited from the expansion of services that Travis mentioned earlier. From a balance sheet perspective, we ended the quarter with just over $70 million of debt that included $53 million of outstanding borrowings under the UMB credit facility, which we used to fund the McCamus acquisition in the quarter. Our net leverage remains at a healthy level, providing meaningful balance sheet flexibility as we look ahead. All in all, we are pleased to reiterate our full year 2026 guidance initiated last month. That's it for me. Back to you, Travis.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Allison. As we move through the year, our focus remains on executing our work safely, maintaining discipline across the organization, and delivering consistent results. I want to thank our shareholders for their continued support and recognize our teams across the business whose work every day drives our performance. Before I open the call for Q&A, I'd like to encourage our stockholders to cast your votes and participate in our virtual annual meeting coming up on May 19th. You can find the details in our proxy materials and on our website. Finally, I'd also like to take this opportunity to recognize and thank Tom Eminet and Peggy Fran for their service on our board. Each of them will be retiring from our board at the annual meeting, at which time the size of our board will decrease from eight directors to six directors. With that, I'd like to open it up for questions. Operator?

Operator | Conference Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star and then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble the roster. The first question will come from Tomo Sano with J.P.

Morgan. Please go ahead. Tomo Sano | Analyst, J.P. Morgan

Hi, good morning, everyone.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

Good morning, Tomo.

Tomo Sano | Analyst, J.P. Morgan

Morning. Morning. So I'd like to ask about the guidance. Given the solid start of the first quarter and the positive project updates in April, there was no upward revision to your whole year guidance. Is this due to conservative assumptions in your outlook, or does it reflect some lag in the marine segment despite the strong performance in concrete? Could you elaborate on the key factors behind maintaining the current guidance, please?

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Sure. I'll start and Travis can fill in. I would say, I mean, we just initiated the guidance last month and we had a pretty good view and I think we continue to have a good view. We have a, you know, given what Travis talked about in the call with regard to bookings post end of the quarter with the 200 million plus, especially more heavily weighted toward Marine, we're feeling more confident with just kind of what that path looks like as things come into focus. But I would say, you know, from a first quarter perspective, the results came in pretty much right in line with what we expected from a profitability perspective. So we felt like it was prudent just to kind of hold where we are. And then as the year plays out, we'll see as those cards get dealt.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Toma, we generally, you know, we want to under-promise and over-deliver. So we're going to take a conservative approach to things like this. generally, and we're going to hold the line for now and see how things progress over the next quarter or two.

Tomo Sano | Analyst, J.P. Morgan

Thank you. And if you could talk about adjusted EBITDA margins contracted year over year in the first quarters, but could you elaborate on your concrete plans for the margin recovery after second quarters, please?

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

I would say that the margin impacts were attributable to just to the phasing of kind of where we are on projects, specifically in Marine. I mean, I assume that we're talking about Marine, which had the margins came down in that business during the quarter. But really just as a, I think, attributable to just phasing of where we are on projects as we, you know, wrapped up many projects toward the end of last year. a lot of goodness will generally come into the numbers we're kicking off. And as we kick off new projects, we generally are a bit more conservative in where we kind of set the stakes initially. So I would say that it's really kind of more of a timing item. We don't see, we aren't seeing any signals that there would be any, you know, consistent or persistent margin degradation over time. If anything, we're seeing the opposite just with just the pipeline and the number of opportunities that we're seeing on the horizon. And then, I mean, concrete had a pretty monster step up in their EBITDA contribution for the quarter. I'll say that, you know, we benefited in our concrete business from good weather. We, you know, a lot of times we'll talk about bad weather, but I mean, this is a quarter where we benefited from Good strong momentum throughout the quarter, good strong utilization and activity throughout the quarter that was not interrupted by weather. And as the concrete projects get larger, we have opportunities to keep our teams on programs to allow them just to have consistent utilization and execution over time, which ultimately serves to lift the margins as there are all those starts and stops. I wouldn't say there are any big good guys that helped concrete in the quarter. I would say that the margins that they delivered were really a product of just really strong execution, good momentum, uninterrupted momentum, and thanks to the guys too.

Tomo Sano | Analyst, J.P. Morgan

Thank you, and congrats on the quarter.

Operator | Conference Operator

Thanks, Tomo. The next question will come from Aaron Spahala with Craig Hallam, please go ahead.

Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

Good morning, Travis and Allison. Thanks for taking the questions. Good morning, Aaron. First for me, good to hear the order activity continuing to pick up into April. You noted seeing acceleration for early work on the energy and petrochem side. Can you talk a little bit about the timeline from that early work and when those could maybe turn into project awards and just any thoughts on what those could look like size-wise, content-wise?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

I think we're seeing a fair amount of activity. I think increased urgency to get projects, you know, with breaking ground and getting going. And there's, you know, I think a lot more conversation about, I think this sort of disruption in the global energy world has woken some things up as well as kind of a, I think probably put some, like I said, put some urgency into getting projects underway.

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and generally as we start seeing the early signals of projects coming to us, and so this is, I mean, mostly on the marine side where we're seeing our larger commercial clients begin the signals of green lighting projects. And there may be a period of three months, six months, or a year. But I would say as we look out onto the horizon, there will be certain projects that will move forward very quickly. And there will also be another set of projects that will move forward to try to get the permitting and all the things that they need to do within this administration. So I think that also, I mean, there's some timelines that are in there. But we do have a good number of clients and programs that we see with the momentum picking up. And on those that are quite serious and are more advanced from a permitting perspective, we would expect those to move forward more quickly.

Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

Thanks for that. And then maybe second, you know, you kind of highlighted an uptick in activity with the Department of War and the Coast Guard. Can you just kind of talk a little bit about what some of those opportunities look like and how you're thinking about timing on those as well?

spk04

The uptick in – on the – oh, yeah, on the president's budget.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, sorry. Yeah, on the president's budget, there were quite a few – budget for military. Now, of course, the president's budget is the way it works. In reality, it's a bit of a wish list that still has to get put in place by Congress. And so I would say directionally, that's the way the administration would like to see things go. And so we'll see how it plays out. But it is good signs, good indicators of what is likely to come out of Congress, assuming they can get a budget passed.

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and I mean, even just putting the proposal out there for $1.5 trillion, I mean, we're at $900 now, so even if it goes up to a trillion, that's still a very large increase. We would expect to benefit from that, especially with just the emphasis on naval superiority, naval dominance, marine infrastructure resilience. Those are all themes that are central to this budget and, I mean, really kind of into the world that we're living in right now. So it's very much accentuated by what's going on in the Middle East.

Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

Understood. Thanks for that. And then maybe one last for me, just with higher fuel prices, you know, some of the kind of tariff developments on maybe Section 232 expansions, just any Margin or backlog sensitivity, any actions you might be taking there on the business side of things?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

The fuel side is something we're watching. We tend to build in contingency in our bids and things like that for fuel spikes. We buy in advance on parts of our business where we burn a lot of fuel, things like that. We're generally, at the moment, okay. We're watching it close. It is something that You know, if it becomes a very long-term situation with high fuel prices, you know, we could see some minor impacts, but it's right now we're in a kind of watch and see mode and make sure we're protecting ourselves as much as we can.

Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

And then just anything on, you know, maybe like steel or anything, you know, coming out of the Section 232 expansions?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

You know, we talked a lot about tariffs, I don't know, about a year ago. And we were generally in pretty good shape with how we bid and bid our work to be, again, either with contingencies in place or we have locked in prices. So we're generally in pretty good shape on the tariff side of things.

Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

All right. Thanks for the call.

I'll turn it over. Operator | Conference Operator

The next question will come from Min Cho with Texas Capital.

Please go ahead. Min Cho | Analyst, Texas Capital

Great. Thank you. Good morning, Travis and Allison. Congratulations. Yeah. Congratulations on your standout quarter for concrete. And I understand that weather was, you know, helped you guys a little bit here. But just given the level of backlog that you have, do you feel like this level of revenue and margins are sustainable in the intermediate term? Again, assuming that, you know, kind of taking weather out of it.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I think between the backlog and the activity we're seeing and the kind of outreach we're getting from owners as well as our general contractor partners, it seems to be like it's going to continue. We don't see a cliff coming or a slowdown happening there. It seems it's very, very active at the moment. A lot of activity that we expect to see coming in throughout the year.

Min Cho | Analyst, Texas Capital

That's excellent. Obviously, EBITDA of about 9 million clearly suggesting back half weighted outlook. So, can you just talk about like what specific drivers, maybe volume, mix or margins that gives you the most confidence in achieving this guidance and where you could see some risk to the greatest risk or greatest upside?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I think it's a timing thing as far as, you know, our marine business a little like this quarter. just with timing of projects and things like that. And then concrete really kicking hard in this quarter. And I think we'll see, as far as the confidence goes, between the backlog and the projects we've won already in the first month of second quarter here. It's been a pretty active quarter this second quarter. And we're We're very confident in the pipeline and backlog we should be able to build this year and work we can deliver in the latter half of the year. I know it's not unlike probably different reasons, but 2024 was a pretty similar year, a little lighter first half and a pretty heavy second half. It's looking to be a similar type of sort of shape to the graph as a couple years ago for different reasons.

Min Cho | Analyst, Texas Capital

Yep. Excellent. And then just finally, Allison, what was J.E. McCamus's contribution to adjust the VEDON recorder?

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

It contributed positively, but I would say that Their contribution was more in opportunity pursuit and building backlog for the future. They won some really nice awards that they'll continue to execute through 2026 and into 2027. And very importantly, they have been very integral in supporting some other really interesting opportunities that we're looking at. So I would say that their contribution was meaningful. Like I said, they did contribute from a profit and a revenue perspective, but nominally. But I would say that the meaningful part of their contribution was really in just scaling their true expertise across both projects that we have currently in flight right now, and also in guiding, advising, and pretty meaningfully supporting some high-value pursuits.

Min Cho | Analyst, Texas Capital

Excellent. Great. Well, congratulations, and good luck in the next quarter. Thank you. Thanks, Min.

Operator | Conference Operator

The next question will come from Jerry Sweeney with Roth Capital.

Please go ahead. Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

Good morning, Travis, Allison, and Barbara. Thanks for taking my call. Morning, Jerry. Morning. I may do something blasphemous and just start with concrete, if that's okay. I appreciate the courtesy laugh. Listen, concrete, really, really great quarter, obviously. And I know you're working on the Iowa projects, but I'm really curious as to, you know, what's your visibility on data center work? Some of our other clients are seeing tons of work coming down the pike. especially as sort of the build-out of these facilities start to expand. And I'm just curious, you know, how much visibility you have and what's the market opportunity this year into next year and even maybe a little bit forward as we look at these projects?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, as we've talked before, but, you know, generally speaking, visibility into data centers is pretty minimal until it's kind of go time, right? Yeah. They're fairly secretive about where they are, what they are, who's doing whatever. Everything's kind of a big secret until it's go time. And so the visibility is always going to be somewhat limited compared to, say, a public sector project in the marine side of the business. However, the activity, as you mentioned, you're hearing is heavy. There's activity really kind of going in several directions. And it seems like there's a lot of big stuff in the works. We're having lots of conversations about really large projects with our key partners and some of the owners that we work with regularly. And it's looking really good for the year for data centers for us.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

And separately, obviously, You know, Iowa was one that you highlighted previously, and I think as you do that and maybe some other projects, does that sort of elevate you in terms of, you know, reference projects and just bring you more and more into this circle, per se?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

I mean, generally speaking, I mean, Jerry, we've done over 50 data centers now. Okay. It's a big, we've got a lot of them under our belt, so definitely we're one of the, one of the key providers in this space, especially in the Texas market where there's a lot of them underway and planned. And so definitely we're kind of, I wouldn't say we're making decisions with the owners, but I would say we have a seat at the table at a lot of the early conversations.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

Got it. One more question. What about the derivative or knock-on effect? Obviously, as these projects more and more come onto the drawing board and they're hitting shovels in the ground, what does that do to just general capacity in the concrete market and even help margins with other projects? It's got to be pulling talent and capacity into the data set of market and maybe raising pricing or margins in other sectors as well, potentially.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I think the data center world, I mean, we're seeing it in Texas for sure, where, and it's not just concrete, but a lot of the trades that are working on these projects, you know, their struggles to find people, find resources, even things like housing and food in some of these more remote areas for all the workers that have to be on these sites. And so it's definitely, you know, there's resource challenges, whether it be people, equipment, materials, whatever. And it's the, I think the owners are finding a way to make it happen. The owners, the general contractors, and the teams on the site are finding ways to make it happen. It's a kind of do or die sort of approach that these owners have, and everybody's finding a way.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

Got it. That's it for me. I'm going to save my marine questions for the follow-up, if that's okay.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

All right.

Operator | Conference Operator

Sounds good.

Thanks. Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

Thanks, guys.

Operator | Conference Operator

Again, if you have a question, please press star and then one. The next question will come from Liam Burke with B Reilly Securities.

Please go ahead. Liam Burke | Analyst, B. Riley Securities

Thank you. Good morning, Travis. Good morning, Allison.

Operator | Conference Operator

Morning, Liam.

Liam Burke | Analyst, B. Riley Securities

Morning. Your operating cash flow year over year was very strong on what typically would be a slower cash flow quarter. As we look into the balance of the year, is there any priority to de-levering, even though the balance sheet is still in pretty good shape?

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

I think the balance sheet is in good shape. I mean, we'll look at opportunities over time. I mean, I would like to potentially carry a little bit less. But I mean, I think we're in a very healthy place. We're right at one and a half time net leverage. And so I think that's a good place for us to be. We might have opportunities to bring that down, but that's not our highest priority. I would say our priority in terms of our capital deployment would be in opportunities to expand just our positioning from an organic growth perspective and whether that means some investments in key equipment, key people, key things that we need to be able to ensure that we are well positioned for the pipeline and converting the organic pipeline maintaining that healthy balance sheet and then potentially other options. But I would say that sitting at a 1.5 times net leverage is a good place for Orion to be, especially with the interest rates that we negotiated earlier this year. And so I think that we're real comfortable right there. But it's always something that we factor into from a capital allocation strategy, but usually we find some productive uses, and especially in a growing business that will require some amount of working capital contributions will probably tend to run around that one and a half times I would expect on a steady state.

Liam Burke | Analyst, B. Riley Securities

So I would gather with your organic opportunities, plus it sounds like McCamus is coming on very nicely, both from an addition and plus the synergies you're gaining. M&A is not one of the options in terms of allocation?

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

I wouldn't say that. And Travis, I mean, well, I'll let you start, Travis, and I'll... Yeah, well, she said it.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

I wouldn't say that. You know, we're going to be... As far as M&A goes, we're going to be very disciplined about the things we look at. But if something comes along that makes good sense and is a reasonable bite, we might be interested in it.

Liam Burke | Analyst, B. Riley Securities

Great. Thank you, Allison. Thank you, Travis.

Operator | Conference Operator

All right.

Allison Vasquez | Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Liam.

Operator | Conference Operator

Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Travis Boone for any closing remarks.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, everyone, for taking the time to join the call today. We look forward to speaking with you in the next quarter.

Operator | Conference Operator

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect. jsPDF 3.0.3 D:20260606090330-00'00'

Research summary and source transcript

readyJun 10, 2026

Orion Group Holdings delivered improved financial performance in FY2025 with revenue growth to $852 million, adjusted EBITDA of $45 million, and free cash flow of $14 million, driven by marine segment strength and strategic actions including the JE McCamus acquisition and credit facility refinancing. However, backlog declined due to timing delays from tariff uncertainty and government shutdowns, which management characterizes as temporary shifts rather than demand destruction. The company enters 2026 with a $23 billion pipeline (including $1.4B from McCamus) and guidance for 9% revenue growth and 24% adjusted EBITDA growth, positioning itself to capture mission-critical marine and data center infrastructure opportunities.

Management knows today that the $23 billion pipeline (including $1.4B from McCamus) and the specific timing of near-term award opportunities—particularly the 'one job away' comment on marine backlog and the visibility into $8.5B of 2026 awards—are not yet reflected in market expectations. While the market sees backlog decline and assumes demand weakness, management has line of sight to specific large projects (>$100M) expected to award in 2026 that will convert pipeline to backlog, a conversion cycle that typically takes 6-24 months in mission-critical infrastructure. This timing gap between pipeline visibility and backlog recognition represents a material information gradient not yet priced in.

Revenue growth driven by mission-critical marine infrastructure and defense projects, concrete construction (particularly data centers), and strategic acquisitions that enhance platform capabilities and margins; operating leverage from improved execution, equipment utilization, and project closeouts; and backlog conversion from a robust pipeline of government and private sector opportunities.

  • Strategic progress via acquisitions (JE McCamus), credit facility refinancing, and asset optimization
  • Backlog timing delays due to tariff uncertainty and government shutdowns, characterized as temporary shifts
  • Strong pipeline growth across marine ($19.4B+) and concrete ($2.4B+) segments, including data center expansion
  • Margin expansion expectations from McCamus integration and concrete scale benefits
  • Data center business momentum, including 46 projects and site civil/earthwork expansion
  • Liquidity and balance sheet strength post-refinancing, with net debt near $6M pre-McCamus funding
  • Travis Boone's emphatic description of data center team performance: 'they are killing it' and 'earned an outstanding reputation'
  • Detailed enthusiasm about data center constructability engagement and early client involvement
  • Pride in strategic actions taken in 2025: 'decisive strategic actions', 'tangible progress for our strategic plan'
  • Confidence in backlog recovery: 'we're one job away from being just fine on the backlog'
  • Allison Boskett's emphasis on credibility in data center constructability: 'our clients are seeing that as a really valuable opportunity'

Management exhibits a credible and direct tone, balancing optimism with acknowledgment of near-term challenges. Travis Boone and Allison Boskett provide specific, evidence-backed claims (e.g., pipeline figures, segment margins, book-to-bill ratio) without overpromising. They acknowledge backlog timing issues frankly while explaining the underlying strength of demand. Their excitement about data centers and McCamus is detailed and grounded in observable progress (e.g., project counts, integration status), avoiding vague hype. There is no evident defensiveness or evasion in core messaging, supporting credibility.

  • No clear dodged analyst question was detected by the local fallback; manual review should still check whether Q&A answers quantified conversion, margins, and guidance.
  • There may be a benchmark or metric-framing issue worth manual review, especially around adjusted metrics, timelines, or changed expectations.

Orion appears to be strengthening its competitive position in mission-critical marine infrastructure and data center concrete construction through strategic acquisitions (JE McCamus), expanded service offerings (site civil/earthwork), and growing pipeline visibility. The company is differentiating itself via execution credibility, particularly in data center constructability, and is positioned to capture increased defense and infrastructure spending. While backlog timing remains a near-term headwind, the underlying market position and pipeline growth suggest competitive gains rather than losses.

  • FY2025 revenue: $852 million
  • FY2025 adjusted EBITDA: $45 million
  • FY2025 free cash flow: $14 million
  • FY2025 marine adjusted EBITDA: $56 million (10% margin, up from ~5% in 2024)
  • FY2025 concrete revenue: $307 million, 12% annual growth
  • FY2025 new bookings: just over $763 million (0.9x book-to-bill)
  • Pipeline as of Dec 31, 2025: $23 billion (includes $1.4B from McCamus), marine pipeline: $19.4B+ (up $3B or 21% sequentially)
  • Data center projects: 46 completed or in progress across Texas, Iowa, Arizona
  • Conversion of near-term pipeline (>$100M projects) to backlog and revenue in 2026, resolving current timing gap
  • Margin expansion from McCamus integration, which operates at 'meaningfully higher margin' than legacy marine
  • Growth in data center concrete work, currently 40% of concrete business and expected to increase
  • Utilization of newly acquired derrick barge later in 2026, increasing execution flexibility for marine/defense work
  • Continued federal defense funding momentum, including referenced '2026 funding for the Department of War Pacific Operations'
  • Backlog remains dependent on timing of public sector awards, which faced delays from government shutdowns and tariff uncertainty in 2025
  • Concrete segment reported an $11M adjusted EBITDA loss in 2025, with margins dependent on favorable project mix and scale benefits that may not persist
  • Integration risk from JE McCamus acquisition, though management cites strong cultural alignment
  • Ability to convert large pipeline ($23B) to backlog and revenue remains unproven in near term despite management confidence
  • Exposure to volatile end markets (defense, private energy/chemical) subject to geopolitical and macroeconomic shifts
  • Capital allocation balance between organic growth, acquisitions, and shareholder returns amid increased M&A term loan facility

Orion has direct and growing exposure to data center construction through its concrete segment, with 46 projects completed or in progress across Texas, Iowa, and Arizona representing approximately 40% of its concrete business. Management highlights early engagement in constructability and site civil/earthwork as competitive advantages, expecting data center work to contribute 'even more significantly' in 2026. This is not speculative; it is a current, expanding operational focus with tangible project counts and revenue contribution, though segment-level financials for data centers specifically are not disclosed.

  • What specific near-term (>$100M) marine and defense projects are expected to award in 2026, and what is the anticipated timing of backlog conversion?
  • How will the JE McCamus acquisition impact marine segment margins and EBITDA contribution in 2026, and what are the integration milestones?
  • What is the expected trajectory of data center revenue as a percentage of concrete business and total company revenue in 2026–2027?
  • How does the company plan to utilize the $40M M&A term loan and $25M uncommitted accordion from the UMB facility, and what is the criteria for future acquisitions?
  • What are the key assumptions driving the 24% adjusted EBITDA growth guidance for 2026, and how much is organic vs. inorganic (McCamus-driven)?
  • How sensitive is concrete segment profitability to shifts in project mix, and what is the sustainable run-rate margin target excluding corporate allocations?

FY2025 Q4 earnings call transcript

35,065 chars

NYSE:ORN Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Generated on 6/6/2026 Operator | Conference Operator: Good morning and welcome to the Orion Group Holdings full year 2025 financial results conference call. All participants will be in a listen only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero on your telephone keypad. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star, and then two. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Margaret Boyce, Investor Relations for Orion.

Please go ahead. Margaret Boyce | Investor Relations, Orion Group Holdings

Thank you, Operator, and thank you all for joining us today to discuss Orion Group Holdings' full-year 2025 financial results. We issued our earnings release after the market last night. It is available in the investor relations section of our website at oriangroupholdingsinc.com. I'm here today with Travis Boone, Chief Executive Officer of Orion, and Allison Boskett, Chief Financial Officer. On today's call, management will provide prepared remarks, and then we will open up the call for your questions. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's comments will include forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as will, be, intend, believe, expect, anticipate, or other comparable words and phrases. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Our actual financial condition and results of operations may vary materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Discussion of the factors that could cause our results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are contained in our SEC filings, including our reports on Form 10Q and 10K. With that, I'll turn the call over to Travis. Travis, please go ahead.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Thank you, Margaret, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss our 2025 results and 2026 guidance. Before we begin, I want to acknowledge the ongoing conflict involving Iran and the Middle East. We extend our sincere appreciation to the men and women bravely serving our country. We recognize the situation remains very fluid and we are actively monitoring developments and evaluating any potential impacts on our business and markets. Now onto my prepared remarks. 2025 was a year of strong operational execution and meaningful advancement of Orion's long-term strategic priorities. We drove both top and bottom line growth and generated good free cash flow. Across the organization, our team delivered with predictable excellence, executing projects safely and profitably, strengthening our balance sheet, and taking important strategic steps that position our company for continued growth ahead. Over the past several years, we have been very clear about what we set out to do, improve execution, strengthen margins, professionalize the organization, and build a platform capable of capturing the significant opportunities across mission-critical marine infrastructure, defense, and concrete construction. In 2025, we translated that strategy into results. Importantly, we took decisive strategic actions that advanced our long-term growth plan. In December, we closed a new $120 million senior credit facility that improves our liquidity, lowers our cost of capital, and provides flexibility to support both organic growth and accretive acquisitions. We also purchased a derrick barge in December to further increase capacity and execution flexibility. As many of you are aware, we've been on the hunt for a large Jones Act derrick barge that will enable our team to pursue a broader range of marine and defense-related work. The barge is currently undergoing some refurbishments, and we expect to deploy it into our operations later this year. Last month, we completed the acquisition of JE McCamus. The transaction greatly enhances our marine platform, particularly in complex jetty and breakwater construction, where McCamus has deep proven expertise. Their strong Pacific footprint, experienced workforce, and high quality equipment fleet expand our ability to execute large, technically demanding projects. Integration is well underway, and we're very encouraged by the strong cultural alignment and the collaboration we're seeing across the combined organization and contracts awarded to McCamus over the last several weeks. In 2025, we consolidated our Houston footprint into our new headquarters office, implemented a modern project management platform, favorably settled multiple litigation matters, and monetized non-strategic real estate. Collectively, these deliberate actions improve our readiness for the next wave of large-scale, mission-critical marine and concrete infrastructure opportunities and reflect tangible progress for our strategic plan. While most aspects of our performance met or exceeded expectations in 2025, backlog was the one area where results were not as we anticipated. Even though our wind weight in 2025 improved over 2024, For the year, we booked just over $763 million in new contracts and change orders across the company, which represented a 0.9 times book to bill. Customer decisions moved to the right primarily due to tariff-related uncertainty in the private sector at the beginning of the year, followed by the prolonged U.S. government shutdown later in the year, which delayed public sector bidding and awards. Importantly, We believe this is only a timing issue with the work simply moving to the right as opposed to going away. We remain confident in our strong demand outlook, which is supported by the tailwinds we're experiencing across our markets. In addition, recent developments in the Middle East may accelerate government action to approve additional defense funding. We remain bullish on our backlog trajectory and long-term growth outlook with a vibrant growing pipeline that is currently at $23 billion, which includes the JE McCamus pipeline of $1.4 billion. Our marine opportunity pipeline increased $3 billion or 21% sequentially to over $19.4 billion as of December 31st. This does not include the McCamus acquisition, which we closed on in February. This growth reflects building demand and urgency across both public and private sector clients And we're pleased with the 2026 funding for the Department of War Pacific Operations. Across our operating regions, we have a healthy volume of opportunities expected to be awarded throughout the year for clients spanning the US Navy, the Coast Guard, regional port authorities, state departments of transportation, and private energy and chemical clients. Moving on to concrete, where our opportunity pipeline grew to over $2.4 billion at the end of 2025. Over the last several years, our team has built a strong and expanding position in data centers and the mission-critical construction market. The team produced good bookings throughout 2025, increasing year-over-year backlog by 10%, with recent awards spanning data centers and other commercial structures. Our expansion into Florida and Arizona is paying dividends, fueled by a growing project pipeline and solid execution. I'd like to drill down into our data center work, a real highlight in our concrete business that is improving literally by the day. I spent a good amount of time with the team last week, and let me tell you, they are killing it. Today, our data center count stands at 46 projects, either completed or in progress, across Texas, Iowa, and Arizona. We're seeing a shift toward larger campus-style developments for which execution and schedule certainty reign supreme. and our team has earned an outstanding reputation as a reliable delivery partner on mission critical programs. In addition to construction of the buildings and foundations, we are increasingly engaging with key clients earlier to address constructability concerns and to implement targeted design improvements. To support these strategies, we've recently expanded into site civil and earthwork to strengthen execution certainty for our clients and also to broaden Orion's scope of services. We expect to see data centers contribute even more significantly to our concrete business this year with some large opportunities developing in our markets. In closing, as I reflect on the year, I'm excited about the deliberate execution of our strategic priorities buoyed by building momentum in our key end markets. With a $23 billion pipeline inclusive of McCamus, a healthy balance sheet, and the best client-centered execution team in the business. We have an excellent runway for 2026 and beyond. With that, I'll turn the call over to Allison to talk through our financial results and our 2026 guidance. Allison?

Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Thanks, Travis. We were pleased with the financial and operational progress we delivered this year, reflecting disciplined executions across the organization and continued focus on profitable growth, cash generation, and balance sheet health. For the full year 2025, revenue increased to $852 million, operating income to $15 million, adjusted EBITDA to $45 million, and adjusted EPS to 25 cents per share. I am also very pleased to report that we generated full-year operating cash flow of $28 million and free cash flow of $14 million. Across all metrics, these results were a notable improvement over last year. From a segment perspective, in 2025, Marine delivered 545 million of revenue, a 4.5% annual growth, and more than doubled its adjusted EBITDA to 56 million for the year. This represents a 10% adjusted EBITDA margin compared to about 5% in 2024. The improvement in adjusted EBITDA was driven by favorable revenue mix, excellent execution, favorable equipment utilization, and positive project closeouts. For reference, Marine's contribution adjusted EBITDA margin for the year was 15%. In 2025, concrete revenues increased 12% annually to $307 million, and concrete reported an $11 million loss in adjusted EBITDA. The reported adjusted EBITDA loss is primarily attributable to the impact of corporate allocations in 2025 and favorable project closeout benefits in 2024 that did not reoccur in this year. Concrete's contribution-adjusted EBITDA margin for the year, excluding corporate, was 4.5%. To provide increased transparency on segment operating margins, we plan to update our reportable segments beginning in the first quarter of 2026. Specifically, we plan to break out corporate expenses separately as a non-operating segment and will no longer allocate those costs to marine and concrete for external reporting purposes. This change is intended to increase transparency of our operating segment's results. Moving on to the balance sheet. As many of you are well aware, late in the fourth quarter, we entered into a five-year, $120 million credit agreement with UMB Bank. This facility meaningfully improves our liquidity, reduces borrowing costs, extends maturity by two years, and positions a balance sheet to fund future investment. It includes a $60 million revolving line of credit, a $20 million equipment term loan facility, and a $40 million M&A term loan. It also includes an additional $25 million uncommitted accordion to fund future growth. The UMB facility refinanced and replaced our previous $88 million credit agreement, which was scheduled to mature in May of 2028. Borrowings under the UMB credit facility bear interest at a rate of SOFR plus 2.5% to 3%, a 40% reduction in our borrowing costs compared to the prior credit agreement. A big shout out to our treasury and legal teams for getting this across the line. In connection with this refinancing, we paid off our $23 million term loan and ended the year with net debt of just about $6 million. I would like to point out that subsequent to year end in February, we increased our senior borrowings by $47 million to fund the McCamus acquisition. I'll wrap up with our guidance update for 2026. We're very pleased to provide our full year 2026 guidance as follows. Revenue in the range of $900 million to $950 million a 9% increase from 2025 at the midpoint. Adjusted EBITDA in the range of 54 million to 58 million, a 24% increase from 2025 at the midpoint. Adjusted EPS in the range of 36 cents to 42 cents, a 56% increase from 2025 at the midpoint. And capital expenditures in the range of 25 to 35 million consistent with last year. That's it for me. Back to you, Travis.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Thank you, Allison. We're very proud of what we accomplished in 2025, and we view this year as a bridge, not a destination. Over the past 12 months, our operations team executed projects safely while growing revenues and adjusted EBITDA. Meanwhile, our corporate team sold the East West Jones property, restructured our credit facility, purchased the Derek Barge, and acquired J.E. McCamus. None of this progress would have been possible without the hard work, dedication, and commitment of our people. I want to thank them for their outstanding efforts. With a strong operating platform, expanded capabilities, and favorable market tailwinds, we're excited about the opportunities ahead and believe Orion is well positioned as we look to capture more work and continue to execute for our employees, clients, and shareholders in 2026 and beyond. We'd now like to open up the call for your questions.

Operator | Conference Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then 1 on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star and then 2. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. And the first question will come from Tomo Sano with JP Morgan.

Please go ahead. Tomo Sano | Analyst, JP Morgan

Hi, good morning, everyone.

spk05

Morning, Tomo. Morning, Tomo.

Tomo Sano | Analyst, JP Morgan

Thank you. In Q4, you talk about some of the delay of the revenue recognitions for awarded projects. And could you talk about the impact your reported sales and margins in Q4? And could you specify which segments or projects, experiences that delays and quantify the revenue and margins impact in 2026, please?

Thank you. Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

I'll start, and Travis, if you want to add in. But from a 2024 perspective or from a Q4 perspective, the fourth quarter came in generally in line with what we expected. We didn't see a lot of softness in the quarter coming generally kind of in line with what we were targeting and in line with the guidance that we had set out for the full year. I'll say that things do typically in construction, they will move around a bit in terms of just timing and cadence. And you probably saw some of that in terms of just margin profiles for the individual segments. But from an overall perspective, things came in in line, including from a corporate perspective. Does that answer your question, Tomo?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

There were a few, there were some opportunities that slid out of Q4 that we were pursuing. But that's not on the, that's more on the kind of pipeline side of things.

Tomo Sano | Analyst, JP Morgan

Yeah, thank you. So could I double click on your commentary about the margins, Alison, if you could talk about the 2026 outlook by segment in terms of the margins expansions from 2025 to 2026?

Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Sure, I'd be happy to. We are continuing to expect that we will have modest margin expansion across the business, both from the favorable impacts of blending McCamus into the marine business. As you probably well recall, McCamus operates at a meaningfully higher margin than the rest of Orion. So we are expecting to see some favorable blend associated with that acquisition and incorporation of their results. And then from a concrete perspective, we do expect that concrete will deliver margins in the mid-single digits. For the year in 2025, concrete delivered margins of right around 4.5%. And we do expect to nudge that up in 2026, just as a function of some favorable demand signals that we're seeing in terms of the work that we're bidding on, the work that we are winning and bringing into backlogs. as well as just continued growth and scale, which benefits our concrete business pretty meaningfully.

Tomo Sano | Analyst, JP Morgan

Thank you. If I may squeeze one more on a data center, Travis, you talk about data centers. Could you quantify the impact in 2026 in terms of the revenue compositions as well as some competitive advantages in data center projects for Orion, please?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

I'm not sure if I'm ready to point to the fence yet on where we're going to land with data centers. As Allison just mentioned, we're seeing a large amount of opportunities that are lining up well with our capabilities and relationships and all of that. We've got We did start, as I mentioned, we've started doing site civil work on some of these data centers, which has been very well received, and we're doing well with that work. So I think that'll expand and continue. And I think we're going to keep seeing just a large amount of data center work happening. I mean, right now it's 40% of our concrete business is data centers. I expect that to probably go up a little in the next year.

Tomo Sano | Analyst, JP Morgan

Thank you.

I appreciate it. Operator | Conference Operator

The next question will come from Aaron Spahala with Craig Hallam.

Please go ahead. Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

Yeah, good morning, Travis and Allison. Thanks for taking the questions. Morning, Aaron. Morning. You know, maybe first for me, just on the pipeline, you know, can you talk a little bit more about that? Sounds like, you know, the expansion pretty broad-based. You know, any thoughts on kind of timeline, you know, conversion to orders? I know you've had a slide that kind of has laid out, you know, timing potential there. And then just, you know, maybe talk about the kind of market and margins you're seeing, you know, quotes and then kind of backlog wise.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Yeah. So the pipeline is, um, has expanded some of that then because things have slid, right. Um, so it's kind of, it's building, but there's also some things sliding, which makes it, uh, get, look like it's getting, uh, even more big, but it's, it's, uh, we've got quite a few near-term opportunities is in 2026, um, that are, you know, a hundred million plus projects, uh, more, let's say more than a dozen, uh, very real, uh, opportunities that are, you know, over, over a hundred million in, uh, in size, which are, you know, gives us a lot of confidence, even though our backlog is down. Um, we're, we're one job away. One project went away from, from the backlog being in, being in good shape. So we're, we're not worried. We're, we're bidding projects, uh, in the real near term here that we feel good about. So, um, we're not, uh, I know maybe, maybe some concern about backlog, but from our, in our minds, we're, uh, we're, we're, we're, we're nowhere near, uh, getting worried. We're, we're in good shape. Uh, we have, we have all the opportunities in front of us and, uh, Like I said, we're one win away from being just fine on the backlog for our marine business. And our concrete business pipeline is growing and looking really strong. As you may recall, our concrete pipeline is typically fairly small because there's a lot of book and burn activity. and its private sector opportunities, which are not super visible, you know, long in advance. So we're excited to see the concrete pipeline creeping up as well as the marine pipeline continuing to expand. And then we added in McCamus that makes it even, gives us even more opportunities to pursue.

Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

And then, you know, outside of McCamus, are you on margins kind of in the, you know, as you're going to bid projects? Is that still, you know, how's that looking?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

On the McCamish side of things, nothing has changed as far as, you know, margins, bid margins and things like that. They're going to continue pursuing projects as they have.

Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

And on the rest of the business?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

And the rest of the business. Things are looking good. We're not seeing any, like, downturns or anything like that. In fact, I would say more the opposite in several of our markets.

Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

Good. Good. And then, you know, maybe second, you know, on the data center side of things, you kind of talked about an expansion, you know, site and civil and earthwork. Any thoughts, high level, what that means for, you know, maybe average project size or, you know, how quickly these projects can continue to turn with that dynamic?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Probably not going to give too much information just for competitive reasons, but... I think it depends on where the data center is and how much infrastructure and dirt work and things like that need to be put in before the concrete and foundations happen. But there can be fairly significant amounts of work that goes into that. And it gives us something else to sell to our customers. And as many of them are kind of shifting to bigger campuses, sometimes those get to be much larger, right? They still do these data centers, and we've talked about this before, but they don't, even though it may be a really large data center, they kind of go a little piece at a time. And it's literally, you know, here's one little piece and another little piece and another little piece, and then you look back, you know, six months later, and you've done a ton of work over a period of time. So it's It's these things turn in from, you know, from a $500,000 task order. And next thing you know, you've done $50 million worth of work a little out of time. So, well, a little out of time, but very quick.

Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Yeah. And I think the other important thing there is as our team, because our team has such a high level of credibility in this really critical aspect on the critical path of these projects in terms of just the buildings, the structure, the infrastructure to support all the really important internal things. But because our team has such credibility in that area, we are being engaged earlier in terms of, as Travis mentioned in the call, some of the constructability, some of the concerns, some of the things that we have seen over the now 46 and counting data centers and campuses that we've worked on in incorporating those lessons for our clients. Our clients are seeing that as a really valuable opportunity. level of expertise that we bring to the table, which means that ultimately, you know, we do become a trusted partner in this aspect of the building and the construction. So it's a pretty exciting time. I mean, really my hat's off to that team who's built very, very strong relationships with a number of key players.

Aaron Spahala | Analyst, Craig Hallam

That sounds great. Thanks for taking the questions. I'll turn it over. Thanks, Aaron. Thanks, Aaron.

Operator | Conference Operator

Again, if you have a question, please press star and then one. The next question will come from Jerry Sweeney with Roth Capital.

Please go ahead. Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

Good morning, Travis and Allison. Thanks for taking my call. Good morning, Jerry.

Margaret Boyce | Investor Relations, Orion Group Holdings

Hi, Jerry.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

Just a couple of follow-up questions, maybe. But just looking at the marine side, obviously, pipeline is growing. You said some of the projects pushed to the right, per se. But are you hearing anything, or do you have any anecdotal commentary on – maybe once some of these projects may come to fruition, obviously they're quite large, complicated. We've had a government shutdown and then we have, you know, escalating conflict in the middle East, but, uh, all that said and done, I'm just curious as to maybe some of the anecdotal, uh, uh, items that you're hearing on those opportunities.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

So, uh, I mean, we're bidding one of them. We're bidding a nice project this week. Um, There are things moving forward now. I guess there's not like a theme, if you will, of the different reasons that they've moved. Some of them move for different things, but they are just shifting to the right. It's not a never-ending shift to the right. They are actually coming to roost at some point, like the one I just mentioned. That was originally supposed to be last year, and we're finally bidding it this week. So there are projects that are coming through. We're bidding quite a few jobs in the next six months, pretty nice ones, along with the normal kind of run-of-the-mill projects that we always go after. But I don't know if I answered your question. Yeah, sorry, go ahead.

Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Well, I'll just add, Jerry, that as we look at the – The pipeline does continue to be very robust. We continue to have our good line of sight into eight, eight and a half billion of opportunities that we expect to be awarded in 2026. And that's pretty normal. We have seen some clients really engage in a more meaningful way, which to us signals that some decisions are likely going to be made in the near term. But as we think about the pipeline, it stacks up to be probably about a 40-60 split in terms of what's going to, for the 2026, what we have visibility into of what will be awarded in the first half versus the second half, which is pretty normal, just given in the federal government there's usually a spike in the third quarter. And so, yes, there are a good number of opportunities that we have both at we are working on bidding on. And then a lot of times we will talk about the number of opportunities that we have provided all information on that we are just awaiting award from the client. And that number continues to sit at right around a billion dollars. So to us, that's a little bit higher than normative, but it's been consistently at that billion dollar mark throughout 2025 and continues to be around a billion dollars now. So that might just be the new norm in terms of You know, when Travis talks about holding the pipeline a little longer, we do continue to see that number just stay right around a billion. But we are seeing some awards, some clients like moving and being more active.

Jerry Sweeney | Analyst, Roth Capital

Gotcha. And at some point, that billion kind of breaks loose, which is positive, obviously, right? That's right. Yeah. Okay. That's it for me.

I appreciate it. Thanks. Operator | Conference Operator

Thanks, Jared. The next question will come from Alex Regal with Texas Capital.

Please go ahead. Alex Regal | Analyst, Texas Capital

Thank you, Travis and Allison. Travis, your historical win rate on bids sort of is in that mid-teens range. Is there any reason to believe that historical win rate will be any different going forward?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

No, we saw that win rate kind of between from 24 to 25, it tipped up, even though our, you know, even though our backlog was down, our win rate was up. So it tells you that things were sliding. So we have seen it head in the right direction just a little bit, a percent or two. And I don't expect it to change much. I mean, it might continue to go up a little, but I don't expect it to be any large jump up or down on the win rate. We kind of like to be in that let's say 15 to 20% win rate sort of range. And that's where we are and feel pretty good about where we are.

Alex Regal | Analyst, Texas Capital

And then as it relates to your adjusted EBITDA guidance of 54 to 58 million, can you bridge that delta from the 45 million you just reported and help us to understand sort of what's organic versus inorganic? And as it relates to sort of the organic Kind of how that's broken out by segment.

Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Sure. I'll give some high-level commentary. I would say that we are always gearing the business toward what we view as good organic growth. So that is like first and foremost really what we are doing to position the company is to invest in organic growth. Organic growth in 2026 is good. I would say it's probably, just in terms of stepping back, I'd say it's in the kind of upper single to low double-digit growth rate from an organic perspective, just because of some of the opportunities that we see moving a bit to the right, specifically in the marine business. I do think that concrete will grow very favorably in 2026. We have signals that that is happening and that it's real. But for Marine, those opportunities, they just take time to get through the pipeline, to get through all of the machine associated with bringing those opportunities to market by our client and then ultimately getting those things awarded. So some of those things that we expected we would see in 2026 have moved a bit to the right. That being said, we do expect that our marine business will continue to grow in 2026. Will it be at the dynamic growth rates that we are anticipating with some of the many things that are coming to market in 26 and 27? Probably you'll see that, I would expect, over the midterm, but that is not today built into our 2026 guidance. What I will say is I'll say that also from a McCamus perspective, that we have good line of sight into what we expect McCamus will deliver, which is right in line with kind of what we set out in the call back in February. They come with a very highly qualified, very reputable, very credible group of people. It's a phenomenal team. It's a phenomenal leadership organization there. We're very excited about bringing them into the portfolio. And we're also very excited about some of the projects that they have won just recently. So they continue to perform. They continue to perform well. And we'll look forward to just bringing them into more of our opportunities and our projects to make our pursuit teams even stronger as we look ahead.

Alex Regal | Analyst, Texas Capital

Very helpful. And then the outlook for backlog near term, I kind of get a sense here that it's probably flattish to maybe trending a little bit down in the first quarter and the second quarter, but you expect a strong rebound in the third and fourth quarters. Is that a fair conclusion to come to?

Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

It's hard to tell just from a backlog perspective. We are working – We are gearing the organization around really a book to build that is greater than one. That is our objective. Our objective is to always be booking more backlogs than we are burning. With that in mind, it's hard from a quarter-to-quarter perspective to predict what backlog is. It does move around just based on how we burn, how operational cadence of the project, and then what gets awarded within a quarter. But from a full year perspective, we do expect to meaningfully deliver good bookings, which ultimately will serve to elevate our backlog balances. I'll also say that from a concrete perspective and really from a dredging perspective as well, Like those two businesses have a very quick book to burn, and so they may have phenomenal years, but you may not see a lot of that manifested in the backlog at quarter ends or year ends just because of the amount of book and burn projects that they get awarded. But are we targeting elevated backlog through the year? Yes, that is absolutely a goal, and we'll track that really through kind of the book to bill and kind of how the organization is delivering on that.

Alex Regal | Analyst, Texas Capital

Thank you.

Allison Boskett | Chief Financial Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Thank you.

Thank you. Operator | Conference Operator

The next question will come from Liam Burke with B Reilly Securities. Please go ahead.

spk05

Thank you. Good morning, Travis. Good morning, Allison. Good morning, Liam. Travis, you talked about closing on the DEREC in late 2025. How quickly, it's a fairly significant commitment, capital commitment. How quickly do you anticipate that investment turning into some sort of measurable return?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

We'll get it, as I mentioned, we've got some work being done on it for the next, I don't know, six to, let's say six to eight months. And once it's kind of in the condition and ready to go, we'll have it. we'll get it busy and get it operational or get it working somewhere in our business. As far as, you know, payback on it, I think we got a pretty good price on it, so I don't think it's going to be a long time to get to kind of return on the investment.

spk05

Great. Thank you. And on the M&A front, the McCamus was opportunistic. Obviously, You don't have a pipeline of opportunistic acquisitions, but what does the acquisition pipeline look like for you?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

It's a pretty active market out there at the moment. Lots of different things happening in the, I don't know, it seems like it's not just across the board. It seems like acquisitions have really gotten pretty strong across all sectors. I'm seeing it kind of all over the place, lots of different acquisitions and activity happening. I mean, we saw, you know, we saw Great Lakes just recently get acquired and go private, and just lots of things happening out there that will give us, potentially give us opportunities to do more in the next year or so.

spk05

Thank you, Travis.

Operator | Conference Operator

This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Travis Boone for any closing remarks.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer, Orion Group Holdings

Thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to talking to you again soon.

Operator | Conference Operator

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect. jsPDF 3.0.3 D:20260606090332-00'00'

Research summary and source transcript

readyJun 10, 2026

Orion Group Holdings reported improved marine segment profitability driven by higher-margin project mix and execution, while concrete segment profitability declined due to non-recurring 2024 project closeout benefits and weather impacts. The company strengthened its balance sheet via the East West Jones property sale, generating over $22 million in net cash proceeds to reduce leverage. Backlog grew to $679 million with $160 million in new awards, and the pipeline remains robust at over $1.2 billion, with 27% tied to data center opportunities. Full-year 2025 guidance was raised across revenue, EBITDA, and EPS.

Management knows that the East West Jones property sale has already closed and delivered over $22 million in net cash proceeds, which is being used to pay down debt and support general corporate purposes—a fact not yet reflected in market pricing as the transaction’s full impact on leverage and liquidity will only appear in fourth-quarter results. Additionally, while the pipeline is disclosed as over $1.2 billion with 27% in data centers, the specific timing and conversion rate of these opportunities—particularly large projects like the Iowa data center and Deschutes estuary—are not yet visible to the market and will not be clear for 6-24 months as they move from bid to award to backlog.

Revenue growth driven by marine and concrete segment performance, backlog conversion from a robust pipeline (especially data center and public infrastructure projects), and margin expansion through operational execution, equipment utilization, and project mix optimization.

  • Backlog growth and pipeline strength
  • Marine segment margin improvement
  • Concrete segment performance and headwinds
  • Data center opportunity exposure
  • East West Jones property sale proceeds and use
  • Guidance upgrades for full-year 2025
  • Travis Boone expressed being 'even more excited about what lies ahead in 2026 and beyond'
  • Allison highlighted the East West Jones sale as a 'significant cash upside' and 'very healthy' leverage position
  • Travis Boone noted 'great performance across the business' and 'really strong performance in dredging'
  • Management emphasized the pipeline remains 'very strong' and 'over a billion dollars' with consistency
  • Travis Boone affirmed confidence in executing the long-term vision despite Pacific project delays

Management displayed a direct, confident, and credible tone throughout the call, providing specific figures and contextual explanations for performance trends without overstating positives. Executives acknowledged headwinds in the concrete segment and project delays in the Pacific while emphasizing operational execution and balance sheet strength. There was no evidence of defensiveness or vagueness; instead, responses were detailed, consistent, and grounded in observable business drivers such as backlog, pipeline, and project execution.

  • There may be at least one Q&A answer that needs manual review for a possible dodge or lack of numerical follow-through.
  • There may be a benchmark or metric-framing issue worth manual review, especially around adjusted metrics, timelines, or changed expectations.

Orion appears to be maintaining or improving its competitive position, particularly in the marine segment where margin expansion and strong backlog growth suggest effective execution and favorable project mix. The company’s ability to grow its pipeline to over $1.2 billion, with significant data center exposure, indicates competitiveness in capturing emerging infrastructure trends. While the concrete segment faces near-term headwinds, the backlog increase and sequential revenue growth suggest underlying demand resilience. There is no evidence of market share loss or competitive disadvantage in the transcript.

  • Marine revenue: $143 million in Q3 2025, up 2% YoY and 6% sequentially
  • Marine adjusted EBITDA: $18 million in Q3 2025, up over 50% YoY, representing 12% margin
  • Concrete revenue: $82 million in Q3 2025, down 5% YoY, up 17% sequentially
  • Concrete adjusted EBITDA: $4 million loss in Q3 2025 vs. $4 million profit in Q3 2024
  • Backlog: $679 million at quarter end, up from prior quarter after $160 million in new awards
  • Pipeline: over $1.2 billion in projects and opportunities awaiting award
  • Data center exposure: ~27% of concrete revenue in Q3 2025 and ~27% of pipeline
  • East West Jones sale: over $22 million net cash proceeds after commissions and taxes
  • Conversion of data center pipeline (27% of total) into backlog and revenue
  • Successful execution and margin sustainability in marine segment
  • Recovery in concrete profitability as weather impacts normalize and project mix improves
  • Deployment of East West Jones sale proceeds to reduce debt and interest expense
  • Award of large projects currently in pipeline, including Iowa data center and Deschutes estuary
  • Continued organic growth from regional expansion (e.g., Atlantic, Phoenix) and bonding capacity utilization
  • Concrete segment profitability remains volatile and dependent on project closeout benefits and weather
  • Backlog growth depends on conversion of pipeline, which may be delayed by client funding or award timing
  • Data center opportunity, while significant in pipeline, may not convert at expected rates or margins
  • Marine margin expansion may not be sustainable if driven by non-recurring closeouts or utilization spikes
  • Interest expense and leverage reduction depend on timely deployment of asset sale proceeds
  • Organic growth initiatives (e.g., Atlantic, Phoenix) may not yield expected returns if execution falters

Orion has direct and growing exposure to the data center opportunity, with management stating that approximately 27% of concrete revenue in Q3 2025 and 27% of the total pipeline are tied to data center projects. The company is actively bidding on a large number of data center projects, including larger facilities such as a 'very large data center' in Iowa, indicating an uptick in average project size compared to two or three years ago. While not yet a dominant revenue driver, the data center vertical represents a meaningful and expanding component of the concrete business and pipeline, with ongoing quoting activity and visibility into future opportunities.

  • What is the expected timeline and conversion rate for the 27% of pipeline tied to data center projects into backlog and revenue?
  • How sustainable is the marine segment’s 12% adjusted EBITDA margin, and to what extent is it driven by recurring operational excellence versus non-recurring project closeouts or utilization benefits?
  • What specific factors are expected to drive a return to profitability in the concrete segment in Q4 2025 and beyond, and what is the anticipated margin trajectory?
  • How will the over $22 million in net proceeds from the East West Jones sale be allocated between debt repayment and general corporate use, and what is the expected impact on interest expense and leverage?
  • What is the status of the Deschutes estuary project, and when is it expected to transition from 'awarded, not booked' to active backlog?
  • How is the company measuring the return on investment from regional expansion initiatives in the Atlantic and Phoenix, and what milestones will indicate success?
  • What is the current utilization rate of the expanded bonding capacity, and what size of projects is it now enabling Orion to bid on?
  • Beyond the Iowa data center, what are the typical project sizes and geographic concentrations of the current data center pipeline?

FY2025 Q3 earnings call transcript

20,920 chars

NYSE:ORN Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Generated on 6/6/2026 Allison | Chief Financial Officer: 14 million year to date. We wrapped up the quarter with 21 million of net debt or just under half a turn of leverage on a TTM EBITDA basis, which is a very healthy place for Orion. As the boss covered earlier, in October, we were very happy to close on the sale of the East West Jones property. The transaction resulted in a significant cash upside of over $22 million net of commissions and taxes and a nominal book charge, which will be reflected in our fourth quarter results. We expect to use the proceeds to pay down debt and for general corporate purposes. From a backlog perspective, we added approximately $160 million in new awards and change orders in the quarter, and at quarter end, backlog stood at $679 million. Moving on to segment results. From a segment perspective, marine revenues increased just about 2% over the third quarter of 2024 and 6% sequentially to $143 million in the quarter. And marine adjusted EBITDA grew over 50% to $18 million in the quarter, which represents a 12% margin this period compared to 7% in the same quarter of 2024. Strong marine margins are attributable to a greater mix of higher margin revenue, excellent execution and project closeouts, and favorable equipment utilization. Concrete revenues decreased 5% over prior years and were up 17% sequentially to $82 million in the quarter, and concrete incurred a $4 million loss in adjusted EBITDA for the quarter compared to a $4 million profit in the third quarter of 2024. The reported adjusted EBITDA reduction is primarily attributable to favorable project closeout benefits in 2024 that did not reoccur in 2025. Some weather issues in the quarter also impacted chargeability in our concrete business this quarter. For reference, concrete's contribution EBITDA margin in the quarter was right at 2%. I'll wrap up with our guidance update. We're very pleased to update our full year 2025 guidance as follows, increasing our revenue guide to $825 million to $860 million, increasing our adjusted EBITDA guide to $44 million to $46 million, increasing our adjusted EPS guide to $0.18 to $0.22, and reiterating our CapEx guide of $25 to $35 million. I'll now pass it back to Travis to wrap it up.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Allison. We have all the pieces in place to finish the year strong, and I'm even more excited about what lies ahead in 2026 and beyond. I want to thank our shareholders for their continued confidence in us and our people for the exceptional work they do every day in the field to deliver safely for our customers. Operator, we're ready to take questions.

Operator | Conference Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then 1 on your touchtone phone. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star, then 2. And our first question today will come from Erin Spectula with Craig Hallam.

Please go ahead. Erin Spectula | Analyst, Craig-Hallam & Co.

Yeah, good morning, Travis and Allison. Thanks for taking the questions. You know, first for me, you know, noticed a slide in the deck on the pipeline, you know, detail on award dates and opportunity size. Can you just maybe talk a little bit about that? You know, has that split by opportunity size been pretty consistent? And just any thoughts on expected traction with some of those larger opportunities?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Aaron. Sure, yeah, we can hit on that slide. So it's um you know we we have been talking about our pipeline for uh for a while in the in the in the increase in size of our pipeline so we have been working to kind of provide some more information on the pipeline based on a lot of questions about about it and so we uh we we just could try to find a way to break it up so people could have a little better fuel for what's in there, when it's coming, and the size of the opportunities. But generally speaking, I would say it's fairly consistent. Our pipeline for next year is very strong. Still got some good opportunities this year that we're working on bringing in the door, and good, very strong opportunities for 2026. So anything to add to that?

Allison | Chief Financial Officer

Just to reiterate the comment from the call on the over a billion dollars of projects and opportunities that we have that are in the queue awaiting award decisions. The number has stayed pretty consistent around that 1.2 billion, so over a billion, which is a really healthy place for us to be. That number has actually grown through the year. If we look back through the earlier part of the year, just because of some of the delays that we're seeing with some of our clients and some of the pauses that our clients have put on. So it's nice to see that bid submitted and awaiting award number continue to be a very robust 1.2 billion.

Erin Spectula | Analyst, Craig-Hallam & Co.

Understood. Uh, thanks for the color there. And then, you know, does that include the, the, the opportunity in Washington with the estuary or, or, you know, maybe just, can you give an update there on, on how, uh, that. Yeah, good.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Good question. So that's the, uh, the Deschutes estuary project that we won, uh, almost a year ago when I believe in late, late 2024, early 2025 timeframe. Uh, it's, it's not included in the, in the pipeline. Um, it's kind of in a weird spot where it's, uh, It's an awarded, not booked project because we've won it, but it's not – so it doesn't show up in backlog, nor does it show up in our pipeline. It's in kind of a weird limbo spot until we actually get under contract to do the work, which is probably going to be about a year or so out before we actually start that work.

So good question. Erin Spectula | Analyst, Craig-Hallam & Co.

Got it. And then – You know, can you just give a little bit more detail on the data center opportunity? Just, you know, how much of the concrete business does that represent today and maybe the pipeline there? You know, are you seeing quoting, you know, pickup, any, you know, average deal size pickup and just how you're thinking about opportunity there as we head into 2026?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Definitely, it's remained very steady on the data center opportunity side of things. We've been, you Bidding quite a large number of projects on data centers. To your question specifically, it's about 27% of our pipeline is data centers and about 27% of our current revenue in 2020 and the quarter, I should say, for concrete was 27% of concrete's revenue for Q3 was data centers. And lots of continuing activity there with bid opportunities.

Erin Spectula | Analyst, Craig-Hallam & Co.

Understood. Thanks for taking the questions. I will turn it over. The next question is from Liam Burke with B Reilly Securities.

Operator | Conference Operator

Please go ahead.

Liam Burke | Analyst, B. Riley Securities

Thank you. Good morning, Travis. Good morning, Allison. Good morning, Liam. Travis, you had, or Allison touched on the negative operating profit for concrete. We're looking at sequential backlog step up. Could we anticipate a more profitable mix in the backlog as we move into the fourth quarter?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yes, definitely. We're expecting concrete to continue to be in a good place. As she mentioned, when you compare it over last year, it doesn't look super favorable based on some big pickups around this time last year. But as far as the concrete business, we remain confident in the profitability and the good business that it is.

Liam Burke | Analyst, B. Riley Securities

Great. Thank you. And have you seen any either good or bad movement on major projects due to policy changes with the administration?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

None that affect us, no. We haven't seen any movement related to policy changes. Some of the movement that's happened has been related to You know, there's been movement in the private sector over the last couple of quarters with awarding projects based on kind of uncertainty around tariffs and things like that. There's been some movement in other, you know, whether it's the Navy opportunities in the Pacific that I talked about last quarter, some of that slid out a year based on funding from Congress and some other things, but no policy-related shifts or changes.

Allison | Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, I would... I would just add that from a regulatory perspective, I mean, the deregulation that we're seeing happening is a benefit to our clients, and some of the tax benefits that are coming in on deductibility of interest and deductibility of fixed assets, the acceleration of those things, those things should continue to reduce the outlook for our commercial clients especially.

Liam Burke | Analyst, B. Riley Securities

Great. Thank you, Travis. Thank you, Allison.

Operator | Conference Operator

Of course. The next question will come from Brent Salmon with DA Davidson.

Please go ahead. Brent Salmon | Analyst, D.A. Davidson

Hey, thanks. Good morning. I guess Travis or Allison, maybe the first question just back to Maureen. I'm trying to think through these really strong results here, the contribution from your two big projects to those margins. And then I guess really get into the point of, you know, what we think is kind of a sustainable solution margin threshold going forward through the segment, especially considering some of the somewhat slower bookings here in the last couple quarters.

Allison | Chief Financial Officer

Sure. I'll start on that. From a margin perspective, we were really pleased with the Marines' performance in the quarter. And I would say that there were some – we saw some benefits that came through, some upsides. But I would also add that they were not unusual in terms of the amounts or the magnitudes we had – or the magnitude. We had really great performance across the business. We had great performance. across the Atlantic, in the Gulf. We had really strong performance in dredging, which you'll see just the uptick in those when we publish the queue later today. But the dredging was very strong in the quarter, which ultimately benefits us, top line and bottom line, because of the very favorable equipment utilization that we get out of that. While there were a handful of upsides that we recognized in the quarter, I wouldn't say they were meaningful. I would say that the more meaningful driver of performance was really the operational performance really led this quarter by dredging so hats off to that team.

Brent Salmon | Analyst, D.A. Davidson

Okay. And then the elevated SG&A, Allison, as you mentioned, is sort of a factor for the lower year-on-year performance. EBIT performance. I guess your thoughts on where that goes going forward. What is that predominantly focused toward? How do you harvest that investment you're making in the business as we think about that going forward?

Allison | Chief Financial Officer

Sure. I would say that A couple of million of the SG&A uptick from a year-over-year perspective is related to investments in the business, like just directly in the advancement of or the expansion into the Atlantic or region for concrete into Phoenix, some of those offices that we're investing in that we're setting up so that they will fuel some of the organic growth that we are expecting going forward. And then I would say that probably the other big driver is there is some lumpiness associated with how certain employee costs were recorded last year as compared to this year that created a quarter over quarter increase, but from a sequential perspective, pretty consistent and in line.

Brent Salmon | Analyst, D.A. Davidson

Okay. And then last one, just in consideration of the balance sheet here, you've obviously got the property sale, which comes in at the end of the year. Maybe just your expectations for cash flow in the fourth quarter, I guess, especially as some of these larger projects wind down, presumably receivables come in. Should we or could we see sort of a big windfall in cash flow into year end?

Allison | Chief Financial Officer

The East West Jones for sure, results in just a $23 million of cash that drops to the bottom line. Now, that'll go through investing, so that'll be an investing activity, not an operating activity, but cash in our treasury, which is nice. And that cash, we have already received that cash, so it's nice to have that in our pocket now. From the rest of the business perspective, I don't see really a downturn in the cash collection cadence. The team is really focused on very keenly identifying, targeting, and going after and reducing our past due balance sheet and really optimizing the working capital on the balance sheet. And I think that you can see that while we only report from a quarter to quarter perspective, you can see that really in the interest expense and the significant step down that we had this quarter from an interest expense perspective. And that step down is related to Just a significant amount of work that the team has put into optimizing the balance sheet so that we could minimize borrowings under the revolver. So do I think that from a fourth quarter perspective, we could see good cash? We will see good cash from East West Jones. We've not seen a slowdown in cash collection activity in the rest of the business. We have a couple of months to go, so we'll see. But so far through October, it's been good.

Operator | Conference Operator

Great.

Thank you. Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Brent.

Operator | Conference Operator

The next question will come from Alex Rigel with Texas Capital.

Please go ahead. Alex Rigel | Analyst, Texas Capital

Thank you. Good morning, Travis and Allison, and congratulations on the sale of EastWest.

That's great news. Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Alex. You've been hearing us talk about that for a lot of years, so.

Alex Rigel | Analyst, Texas Capital

Good to see you got the sale done. Quick question for you on that. Is there a way for us to think about what the present value of the dredge spoil sort of 10-year agreement is at that site?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, probably we're going to keep the details on that. just for competitive advantage purposes to ourselves. But part of the reason we were okay taking a lower purchase price on that is because we were able to find a way to kind of use the property again through being able to use it for dredge spoils going forward.

It's good news. Alex Rigel | Analyst, Texas Capital

And then as it relates to your expanded bonding capacity, can you talk about the value of bonds you have outstanding right now? And I guess what I'm trying to get to here is just what is the kind of remaining opportunity balance that you have with that new bonding capacity?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

I'll say it this way. We had a fair amount of available capacity before we got this increase. What this does is just allow us to – continue to bid larger projects and facilitate the growth that we see coming here in the next few years. So obviously we're going to keep working on adding additional bonding capacity to the mix to continue to kind of stay in front of our ability to grow and bid bigger projects.

Alex Rigel | Analyst, Texas Capital

And then lastly, as it relates to the data centers, Have you seen a notable increase in the size of the project opportunity for these data centers? And how does that compare to, say, two or three years ago?

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Compared to two or three years ago, I would say definitely there's some bigger ones in the mix now. We did do a large one a couple of years ago in North Texas, and that was kind of a one-off, but it seems like now there are more of those larger type – larger data centers that we have visibility to and are bidding on. We've talked about the one we're working on in Iowa. It's a large data center, a very large data center.

Thank you very much. Operator | Conference Operator

Again, if you have a question, please press star, then 1. Our next question will come from Jason Usainer with Bumbershoot Holdings.

Please go ahead. Jason Usainer | Analyst, Bumbershoot Holdings

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions and congrats on finally closing the East West Jones sale in a great quarter. It was about a year ago that I was asking you during the World Series about this field of dreams vision and there was kind of clear daylight for significant growth in demand for the marine services coming over the next couple of years and just not a lot of contention it felt like that you've kind of built the right platform to capitalize it and so the question i had then was kind of really around execution and margin profile and so it feels like kind of this year some of those big pursuits with the navy slid out a little bit um you know kind of started to talk about the transformational growth 2026 and beyond and so not a lot of change in the vision but just kind of maybe this delayed onset so just kind of to update on the overall long-term vision that you're you know you're building it and that it's coming on the demand side, everything from your prepared script, you know, the bonding, the pre-approved Mac team kind of sounds like there's still a lot of clear catalysts that all the growth is coming and, you know, answered it a little bit in the Q and a, but maybe just, reiterate anything that could cause shocks to that investment in the Pacific and just sort of this whole vision of demand materializing. And then, you know, to the extent that it does kind of come the way you're envisioning, whether, you know, you still think it's likely to translate to some of those long-term profitability targets that you previously laid out.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Sure. Yeah. Thanks, Jason. I think you kind of answered your question for me, I think, a little bit, but it definitely – The way we saw it a year ago, we still see everything the same, if not even more confident now, because we've delivered on getting some things accomplished over the last year that we were working toward. And so as far as the vision, if you will, is still the same. The only thing that's changed a little bit is some of those delays and some of the bigger changes contract opportunities in the Pacific that slid out a year. So that's really the only thing that's changed from a year ago. And so we're continuing to invest and work toward the growth opportunity that we see in front of us. Everything is going as planned. Everything that's in our control is going better than planned, I would say. And there's a couple of, you know, the biggest thing out of our control is those opportunities sliding to the right. But we feel like we've executed well on our plan, and we've delivered, and we're going to continue to do that. And, you know, when those opportunities do show up, we're going to knock them down and keep going.

Allison | Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and I would just ask that, Jason, that, I mean, the beautiful part about this business is it's not singularly threaded. Like, this is a multifaceted business, and so the opportunities in the Pacific are exciting, and they, you know, afford us, you know, some pretty interesting growth catalysts in the future. But, you know, today we're starting on, you know, a large project or starting on a large project in Texas on a large bridge project over water. We have a big port project that's going on in South Carolina. So there are a number of other opportunities that we pursue and that we win and that we are executing that are outside of the Pacific. The Pacific is exciting, but it's not the only story here.

Jason Usainer | Analyst, Bumbershoot Holdings

Okay, great. Appreciate the answers and congrats on a great quarter.

Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Jason.

Operator | Conference Operator

Thanks. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Travis Boone for any closing remarks.

Please go ahead. Travis Boone | Chief Executive Officer

Thank you all for joining our call today. We're super excited about where we are as a company and looking forward to coming back to you with our year-end results here in a few months. And also want to thank our team, all of you guys working hard every day to make this business work.

Operator | Conference Operator

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect. jsPDF 3.0.3 D:20260606090333-00'00'