NASDAQ / Last 4 quarters

GSIT earnings call analysis

GSI Technology, Inc.. AI-assisted transcript summaries focused on management tone, evasions, goalpost moving, catalysts, risks, and data-center exposure.

4 storedJun 10, 2026

Research summary and source transcript

readyJun 10, 2026

GSI Technology reported strong Q1 FY2026 revenue growth of 35% year-over-year to $6.3 million, driven by rising demand for S-RAM chips tied to AI processor momentum and improved gross margin expansion of 200 bps sequentially and over 1100 bps year-over-year. The company advanced its Gemini 2 chip development, resolving all loan bugs and delivering LiDAR 2 boards to a defense contractor for satellite and drone proof-of-concept work, keeping it on track for roadmap milestones. However, near-term SRAM sales face headwinds from extended lead times due to supply chain shifts from China to Taiwan, which may delay shipments despite stable customer order volumes, creating a potential information gap between current execution and future revenue recognition.

Management knows today that supply chain disruptions from U.S. tariffs shifting assembly from China to Taiwan have extended lead times for back-end production in Taiwan, causing a portion of Q1 backlog to be unshippable in Q2 despite stable customer ordering patterns. This temporary fulfillment delay is not yet reflected in market expectations, which may assume linear revenue progression. Over the next 6-24 months, as customers adjust ordering patterns and supply chain constraints ease, the deferred shipments could result in stronger-than-expected quarters, creating an information gradient where current revenue understates future potential once lead time issues are resolved.

Revenue growth is driven by demand for high-performance SRAM chips in AI chip emulation and enterprise AI adoption, gross margin expansion from product mix and scale benefits, and progress on Gemini 2 chip development enabling future opportunities in edge AI, satellite, and drone applications.

  • Gemini 2 chip development milestones and roadmap progress
  • Supply chain constraints due to Taiwan assembly shifts and extended lead times
  • Strong demand for SRAM from AI processor momentum and hyperscaler activity
  • Strategic evaluation of funding options for software and application team expansion
  • Defense and satellite market opportunities for Gemini 2 with low-power variants
  • Detailed explanation of Gemini 2's architecture enabling high-density, high-performance internal SRAM for efficient LLM processing at the edge
  • Enthusiasm about Gemini 2's suitability for large language models (LLMs) in edge applications due to flexible bit processing and memory path efficiency
  • Excitement about delivering LiDAR 2 boards with Gemini 2 to a defense contractor for satellite and drone proof-of-concept work
  • Confidence in Gemini 2's positioning for edge AI in GPS-denied environments and next-generation satellite applications
  • Optimism about improving the AI compiler and developing ready-to-use vision and multimodal libraries to ease adoption

Management demonstrated directness and credibility by providing specific, evidence-backed details on product milestones (e.g., resolved loan bugs, delivered LiDAR 2 board), quantifying customer sales percentages, and explaining supply chain issues with clear causality (U.S. tariffs → China-to-Taiwan assembly shift → Taiwan back-end capacity strain → extended lead times). They acknowledged weaknesses (KYEC sales decline, shipment delays) without deflection and provided logical outs (customer inventory normalization, future adjustment to lead times). The tone was measured, avoiding overpromising while highlighting tangible progress, which enhances trustworthiness.

  • No clear dodged analyst question was detected by the local fallback; manual review should still check whether Q&A answers quantified conversion, margins, and guidance.
  • There may be a benchmark or metric-framing issue worth manual review, especially around adjusted metrics, timelines, or changed expectations.

The company appears to be strengthening its competitive position in niche edge AI markets through Gemini 2's unique architecture (bit flexibility, high-density SRAM) and software ecosystem development, particularly for latency- and power-sensitive applications like drones in GPS-denied environments. However, in the broader SRAM market, it remains a small player dependent on niche customers (emulation, defense) without evidence of gaining share against larger competitors. Competitive positioning is improving in emerging edge AI segments but not yet assessable as a clear winner in legacy SRAM markets.

  • Net revenue of $6.3 million in Q1 FY2026, up 7% sequentially and 35% year-over-year
  • Gross margin of 58.1% in Q1 FY2026, up 200 bps sequentially and over 1100 bps year-over-year
  • Operating expenses declined 15% year-over-year to $5.8 million in Q1 FY2026
  • Cash and cash equivalents of $22.7 million at June 30, 2025, up from $13.4 million at March 31, 2025
  • Q2 FY2026 revenue guidance range of $5.9 million to $6.7 million with gross margin of 56% to 58%
  • Sales to Cadence Design Systems were $1.5 million or 23.9% of net revenues in Q1 FY2026, compared to zero in the year-ago period
  • Resolution of all loan bugs in Gemini 2 silicon, making it fully functional and ready for production
  • Delivery of LiDAR 2 board with Gemini 2 to offshore defense contractor for satellite and drone proof-of-concept work
  • Expected stabilization of SRAM order volume from largest customer despite current supply chain constraints
  • Anticipated improvement in fulfillment as customers adjust to extended lead times, potentially boosting future quarters
  • Ongoing development of AI compiler and software libraries to enable easier adoption of Gemini 2 for edge AI applications
  • Extended lead times due to supply chain shifts from China to Taiwan may delay SRAM shipments and impact near-term revenue despite stable order volumes
  • Dependence on a few large customers (e.g., KYEC, Cadence, Nokia) creates concentration risk, as seen in KYEC's sales decline to 4.3% of revenue from 21.9% year-over-year
  • Success of Gemini 2 in edge AI, satellite, and drone markets remains unproven and dependent on software ecosystem development and customer adoption
  • Ongoing need for additional funding to scale software and application teams may dilute shareholders or increase debt if not financed via ATM
  • Operating losses persist ($2.2 million in Q1 FY2026), and profitability depends on scaling revenue while controlling R&D and SG&A expenses

There is no direct evidence of data center exposure in the transcript. The company's focus is on edge AI applications (drones, satellites, GPS-denied environments) and AI chip emulation systems for design validation, not data center infrastructure. While SRAM sales are tied to AI processor momentum and hyperscaler activity, this relates to chip design and emulation (e.g., Cadence systems), not deployment in data centers. Gemini 2's architecture is positioned for edge devices with low power and high efficiency, not data center workloads. Any data center impact would be indirect and speculative, such as through enabling better AI chip design that could eventually be used in data centers, but this is not discussed or implied in the call.

  • What specific metrics will management use to determine when supply chain constraints have eased and lead times have normalized?
  • How much additional funding is required to scale the software and application teams for Gemini 2, and what is the expected timeline for securing it via ATM or other means?
  • What are the key milestones and timelines for proving Gemini 2's viability in satellite and drone applications beyond the initial proof-of-concept with the defense contractor?
  • How will management measure success in developing the AI compiler and software libraries to drive adoption of Gemini 2 for edge AI workloads?
  • Beyond the largest customer, what is the expected order velocity and revenue contribution from normalized SRAM customers as inventory levels stabilize?
  • What are the gross margin implications if product mix shifts toward lower-margin SRAM sales versus higher-margin Gemini 2-related opportunities as the latter scales?

FY2026 Q1 earnings call transcript

19,454 chars
NASDAQ:GSIT Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript Generated on 6/6/2026 Operator | Conference Call Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to GSI Technologies' first quarter fiscal 2026 results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session. At that time, we will provide instructions for those interested in entering the queue for the Q&A. Before we begin today's call, the company has requested that I read the following Safe Harbor statement. The matters discussed in this conference call may include forward-looking statements regarding future events and future performance of GSI technology that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties are described in the company's Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, I have also been asked to advise you that this conference call is being recorded today, July 31, 2025, at the request of GSI Technology. Hosting the call today is Li-Lin Xu, the company's chairman, president, and chief executive officer. With him are Douglas Shirley, chief financial officer, and Didier Lacerre, vice president of sales. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Xu. Please go ahead, sir. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer: Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Let me begin with a few key highlights from this quarter's financial results. Fiscal 2026 is off to a strong start. In the first quarter, we achieved net revenue of $6.3 million, up 7% sequentially, and 35% year-over-year. This growth was fueled by rising demand for our S-RAN chips. driven by strong market momentum for leading AI processors. Our profitability nature also improved this quarter with a 200 basis points sequential increase in growth margin and over 1100 basis points compared to the prior year. We have also made meaningful progress on cost control over the last year with operating expenses declining by 15% year-over-year, including the gain from the sale of our recorder in Q1 2025. Now I would like to provide an update on our product roadmap and customer milestones. We have completed the evaluation of the second spring of our Gemini 2 chip. I am pleased to report that all loan bugs have been resolved, the silicon is fully functional, and ready for production. This week, the LiDAR 2 board and associated algorithms were delivered to a key offshore defense contractor for proof of contract work with Gemini 2 for satellites and drones. This delivery keeps us firmly on track with our roadmap and customer commitment. And while this is a major milestone, we also believe it represents an opportunity to play in both markets with Gemini 2. Didier will provide more details on this subject in a few minutes. CSI is at a pivotal point in its development. We plan to target high growth opportunities for Gemini 2 in the satellite, zone, and edge computing sectors. These are markets that are increasingly defined by AI-driven capabilities. We are evaluating options to access funds to expand our software and application teams to then develop the platform necessary for future customer fulfillment and support. Management is actively working with the board and our advisor to evaluate strategic options that will enable us to scale efficiently. Our real-time priorities include include funding the extension of our software and application teams, and advancing the development of the platform required to support future customer development deployment of Gemini 2. Accelerating the launch of Gemini 2 is key to laying the groundwork for our next generation APU, platform, and advancing companies' long-term product romance. In the meantime, the ATN has provided variable flexibility, allowing us to raise $11 million today, let alone fee. As a result, we ended the first quarter with a spending cash partition of $22.7 million. Now I hand the call over to Didier, who will discuss our business development and sales activities. Please go ahead, Didier. Didier Lacerre | Vice President of Sales: Thank you, Lillian. Starting with our SRAM business, we had another strong quarter of sales to KYEC and Canis Design Systems, a leading provider of AI chip emulation systems. We have experienced our third consecutive quarter of rising SRAM sales, driven by the growth with the enterprise adoption of AI and also in the generative AI by hyperscalers who are training ever larger models. Despite continued strong demand for high-performance SRAM chips, Extended lead times are impacting our second quarter of fiscal 26 sales. While customers have maintained typical ordering patterns, a portion of our backlog is not shippable this quarter due to these supply constraints. We've proactively informed all of our distributors and sales representatives of the situation. It may take some time for customers to adjust to the increased lead time accordingly. In the interim, we anticipate instances where orders cannot be fulfilled within the request timeframe. Although forecasts from our largest customers remain solid, we expect SRAM revenue for the remainder of the fiscal 2026 to be stable compared to first quarter as we navigate these supply chain challenges. Switching to deliverables for our SBIRs, as Leland mentioned, we also have completed the development of our SAR and YOLO3 and YOLO5 algorithms optimized for Edge AI applications. In parallel, we also shipped a LIDA2 board with a low power version of our Gemini 2 chip to an offshore defense contractor with whom we have been working with for over a year. Both of these are now available for POC opportunities with other partners. Our defense work with the low power version of Gemini 2 has highlighted the chip's capability to address large models at the edge in varying capacity versions, depending on the latency and power sensitivity of the application. This makes Gemini 2, in conjunction with the SAR and YOLO 3 and YOLO 5 algorithms, very well positioned for the broader market potential of applications moving to the edge, and particularly for high demand, high volume, and high mixed processing needs of drones operating in GPS-denied environments, as well as next-generation satellite applications. Gemini 2 is also well-suited for large language models, or LLMs for short, for edge applications. LLMs require a high density, high performance memory path from external DRAM to the internal SRAM next to the processor. Gemini 2's compute and memory architecture provides high density, high performance internal SRAM to allow a high efficiency memory path for high speed and lower power, I'm sorry, low power operations required by LLMs. Gemini 2 is also a bit processor that is flexible to do one bit to 32 bit or larger operations in the same circuit efficiently, which further enhances the capability for LLM processing. We are developing a multimodal LLM charting edge applications and will have benchmark results available next quarter. To ease the adoption of the technology, we will continue to improve the AI compiler for Gemini 2, which is currently in its initial release phase. In parallel, we continue to develop ready-to-use vision, multimodal, and recognition apps and libraries. Our software team is also developing dynamic, low-precision software libraries that support larger models, enabling high accuracy at low powers in edge devices. This is a major enabler for efficient edge AI. As a bit engine, we are uniquely capable of addressing these edge needs where compute, memory, and power resources are far limited. As Leline mentioned, we are eager to advance our software development team to pursue drone and satellite AI chip applications with Gemini 2. Let me switch now to our first quarter customer and product breakdown. In the first quarter of fiscal 2026, sales to KYEC were $267,000 or 4.3% of net revenues compared to $1 million or 21.9% of net revenues in the same period a year ago and $1.7 million or 29.5% of net revenues in its prior quarter. Sales to Nokia were $536,000 or 8.5% of revenues compared to $998,000 or 21.4% of net revenues in the same period a year ago and $444,000 or 7.5% of net revenues in the prior quarter. Sales to cadence design systems were 1.5 million or 23.9% of net revenues compared to zero in the same period a year ago and 642,000 or 10.9% of net revenues in the prior quarter. Defense and military sales were 19.1% of first quarter shipments compared to 31.9% of shipments in the comparable quarter a year ago and 30.7% of shipments in the prior quarter. SigmaQuad sales were 62.5% of first quarter shipments compared to 36.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2025 and 39.3% in the prior quarter. Regarding our SRAM business outlook, our largest customer is currently navigating supply chain constraints. However, we expect their order volume to remain stable for the rest of this fiscal year. Meanwhile, other SRAM customers have largely normalized their inventory levels, and we anticipate continued order activity from them as well. I'd like to hand the call over to Doug. Go ahead, Doug. Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: Thank you, DDA. We reported net revenues of $6.3 million for the first quarter fiscal 2026, compared to $4.7 million for the first quarter fiscal 2025, and $5.9 million for the fourth quarter fiscal 2025. Gross margin was 58.1% in the first quarter fiscal 2026, compared to 46.3% in the first quarter fiscal 2025, and 56.1% in the preceding fourth quarter of fiscal 2025. The increase in gross margin in the first quarter of 2026 was primarily due to product mix and benefits of scale from higher revenue on the fixed cost of revenues. Total operating expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 were $5.8 million compared to $6.8 million in the year-ago quarter, excluding a one-time gain of $5.7 million on the sale and lease back to the company's corporate headquarters and $5.6 million in the prior quarter. Research and development expenses were $3.1 million compared to $4.2 million in the prior year period and $3 million in the prior quarter. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $2.7 million compared to $2.6 million in both the prior year and previous quarter. First quarter fiscal 2026 operating loss was $2.2 million compared to an operating loss of $4.7 million in the year-ago quarter, excluding the $5.7 million one-time gain previously mentioned related to the company's corporate headquarters and an operating loss of $2.3 million in the prior quarter. The first quarter fiscal 2026 net loss included interest and other income of $13,000 and a tax provision of $54,000. compared to $55,000 in interest and other income and a tax provision of $57,000 for the same period a year ago. In the preceding fourth quarter, net loss included interest and other income of $52,000 and a tax provision of $6,000. Net loss in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 was $2.1 million or $0.08 per diluted share compared to net income of $1.1 million or $0.04 per diluted share for the first quarter fiscal 2025. Net income for the year-ago period reflects the $5.7 million one-time gain on the sale and leaseback transaction at the company's headquarters. For the prior fourth fiscal quarter of 2025, net loss was $2.2 million compared to a $0.09 loss per share. Total first quarter pre-tax stock-based compensation expense was $341,000, compared to $658,000 in the comparable quarter a year ago, and $512,000 in the prior quarter. At June 30, 2025, the company had $22.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $13.4 million at March 31, 2025. Working capital was $25.7 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $16.4 million at March 31, 2025. Stockholders' equity as of June 30, 2025 was $37.4 million, compared to $28.2 million as of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. On an earnings conference call in May 2024, we announced that the company had initiated a comprehensive strategic view, established a special committee of the board to evaluate strategic alternatives, and engaged Needham & Company as our strategic and financial advisor to assist in the process. As Leland mentioned, we are actively evaluating potential strategic opportunities to secure the necessary capital to advance the development of our APU products. In the interim, we may choose to draw on the remaining balance of the ATM during upcoming trading windows to support near-term funding needs related to Gemini II development, depending on market conditions and other factors. Finishing with the outlook for the second quarter of fiscal 2026, we expect net revenues the second fiscal quarter to range between $5.9 million and $6.7 million, with gross margin in the range of 56% to 58%. We remain focused on disciplined execution to bring Gemini 2 to market, advancing our roadmap for PLATO while developing long-term shareholder value. Operator, at this point, we will open the call to Q&A. Operator | Conference Call Operator: Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Operator | Conference Call Operator: One moment, please, while we poll for questions. The first question is from Tony Reno from a private investor. Please go ahead. Unidentified Participant: Hi, how are you guys? Good. Thank you. Tony Reno | Private Investor: So, um, can you provide a little more color on the supply chain issues? Didier Lacerre | Vice President of Sales: Sure. Yeah. So I'm sure you're aware of all the tariffs that are being thrown around by the U S government. And a lot of these are directed at China. And so a lot of the folks who have been doing, assembly in China are moving some of their assembly to Taiwan. And so it's really affecting the capacity in Taiwan. And as you know, we do all of our back end in Taiwan. So it's thrown out the lead times pretty much overnight to us because of that transition. Tony Reno | Private Investor: Will that end up making the customers possibly order earlier? Didier Lacerre | Vice President of Sales: Correct. Yeah. So that's something I mentioned a little earlier, which is, you know, this came about very quickly, and then customers have been used to their ordering patterns based off of lead times we've quoted. So we have gone back to them via our reps and our distributors to make sure they understand they need to get more backlog coverage in place so that their future orders will not be late or delayed. And so in the future, we anticipate this won't be a problem, but for the current quarter end and possibly into next, there will be some backlog that would have been shippable that will be delayed a bit just because of these lead times. Tony Reno | Private Investor: Yes, and it'll just make the further quarters probably even stronger then once we get out of that. Possibly. Yes. So sales to KYEC seem a little weak this quarter. Can you comment on that a little bit? Didier Lacerre | Vice President of Sales: Sure. Yeah. So part of that was the inventory levels that I mentioned in mind, which have seemed to stabilize along with the with the lead time as well. Yeah, they unfortunately those orders come in within lead time and we've been able to react in the past and we weren't able to this past quarter. Tony Reno | Private Investor: And like with cadence, those orders are pretty, pretty strong this quarter. What type of product are you shipping to them? Didier Lacerre | Vice President of Sales: Yeah, so there are emulation systems. This is kind of what we've talked about. Even though we don't sell our SRAMs directly into AI applications, we do a lot of support. KYC is supporting the manufacturing of AI chips. The cadence systems are emulations to emulate the design of some of these GPUs and other devices. So it's It's emulation systems in the front end design. Tony Reno | Private Investor: Okay, thank you. And last question, as far as the ATM is concerned, what are the trading windows for the company for that? Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: Well, typically our trading window starts two days after our earnings call. So in the case of this quarter, the trading window will open on Tuesday and it closes on the 15th of the last month of the quarter. So that would mean... In this case, September 15th for the last trading day up to the 15th of the month. Okay. Tony Reno | Private Investor: All right. Well, thank you very much, guys, and good luck in the future. Unidentified Participant: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Tony. Operator | Conference Call Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to Li-Lin Xu for closing comments. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer: Thank you all for joining us. Please join us on August 20th. at upcoming need in virtual semiconductor comfort. Didier Lacerre | Vice President of Sales: Actually, operator, there is one more question that just popped up. Operator | Conference Call Operator: I see that now. Yep. Okay. We have a question now from Anna Chapman from 2 Chron 5 Productions. Please go ahead. Anna Chapman | 2 Chron 5 Productions: Yes. My background has always been in sales and capital equipment. I want to know how you're incentivizing your sales force because, to me, you make one of the best products out there. It has an excellent portfolio. How are you incentivizing these people? Unidentified Participant: It seems like your sales should be more in the pipeline. That's my question. Didier Lacerre | Vice President of Sales: I'm sorry, was that an advertising or was that a question? I'm not sure I got the question. Anna Chapman | 2 Chron 5 Productions: I'm asking how to the distributors, to your sales force, are they incentivizing? Is your product one of their number one things in their bag? Or is it like number 12 or maybe an afterthought? Unidentified Participant: How are you incentivizing these people to go out there and tell your story? And get sales. Unidentified Participant: Yeah. Didier Lacerre | Vice President of Sales: So our independent sales reps are paid on commission. So they're paid on shipment of product. And distributors are paid on margin. And so... With our independent sales reps, there's no competing lines, and they understand that our products are door openers, and so certainly they're important lines for them. And, again, with distributors, we do have large distributors. As you know, we have Avnet, which carries most of the lines. And so with them, the incentivization is in the margin, and GSI generally pays them above corporate average for the margins. Unidentified Participant: Okay. All right. I think they need to do better, quite frankly. Just my opinion. All right. Operator? Operator | Conference Call Operator: Great. There are no further questions at this time. Operator | Conference Call Operator: This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation. jsPDF 3.0.3 D:20260606090140-00'00'

Research summary and source transcript

readyJun 10, 2026

GSI Technology reported Q4 FY2025 revenue growth of 14% YoY to $5.9 million, driven by strong demand for its essence chip and initial radiation-hardened SRAM order from a North American prime contractor. The company reduced its net loss by 49% YoY to $2.2 million in Q4 and improved cash position to $13.4 million, reflecting disciplined cost control and SBIR funding offsets. However, full-year revenue declined 6% to $20.5 million, and the business remains dependent on narrow customer concentrations and government funding, with no clear path to sustainable profitability or scale in commercial markets.

Management knows today that the initial radiation-hardened SRAM order from a North American prime contractor carries significantly higher gross margins than traditional products and anticipates follow-on orders in FY2026, which could materially improve profitability if converted to recurring revenue. This insight is not yet reflected in the market, as the order is still early-stage, no follow-on commitments are quantified, and the company has not disclosed pricing, volume, or margin specifics. The market likely will not gain visibility into the true commercial viability and scalability of this win for 6-24 months, pending actual shipment volumes, renewal rates, and margin realization.

Revenue growth is driven by: (1) demand for high-density SRAM in chip manufacturing (notably KYEC tied to AI GPU demand), (2) government SBIR funding offsetting R&D expenses, and (3) early-stage commercial and defense interest in radiation-hardened and AI-edge chips (Plato, Gemini 2).

  • Radiation-hardened SRAM order from North American prime contractor and follow-on expectations
  • Plato chip enhancements (camera interface, connectivity) for edge AI and agentic applications
  • Progress and funding from SBIR programs with Space Development Agency, Air Force Research Labs, and U.S. Army
  • Customer concentration and sales trends (KYEC, Nokia, military defense, Sigma Quad)
  • Cost discipline, reduced operating expenses, and cash preservation via SBIR reimbursements and asset sale gains
  • Detailed elaboration on Plato’s camera interface integration enabling edge AI agents and object recognition
  • Enthusiasm about strategic interest in Plato from multiple parties for partnership scaling and development funding
  • Emphasis on radiation-hardened SRAM’s 'significant higher gross margin' as a financial lever to reduce cash burn
  • Excitement about SBIR milestones being met and anticipation of additional $1 million in funding
  • Highlighting Gemini 2’s edge deployment potential (drones, satellites) as an evolution of Gemini 1’s SAR capabilities

Management communicates with directness and specificity when discussing product capabilities, customer engagements, and financial results, using concrete examples such as named customers (KYEC, Nokia), dollar amounts from SBIRs, and technical descriptions of chip features. However, when questioned about commercial TAM, hyperscaler interest, or strategic alternatives (e.g., Needham), responses become vague, deferential, or non-committal—phrases like 'we haven’t put out TAM numbers yet,' 'nothing specific to talk about,' and 'really nothing is off the table' suggest a lack of actionable progress or deliberate restraint in disclosure. This contrast indicates credibility in operational updates but caution or uncertainty in forward-looking, market-facing opportunities.

  • Robert Christian’s question about Needham’s specific opportunities or options presented to the company
  • Michael Cooper’s follow-up on what Needham has actually delivered in terms of tangible opportunities
  • Robert Christian’s inquiry about whether hyperscalers are actively engaging with the company on Gemini 2
  • No clear goalpost move was detected by the local fallback; the main follow-up is whether future quarters keep the same KPIs and conversion targets.

The company appears to be maintaining a niche position in specialized SRAM markets (radiation-hardened, edge AI) but lacks evidence of winning share or scaling against broader competitors. Wins are limited to early-stage government contracts and single-customer dependencies (e.g., KYEC for standard SRAM, one prime contractor for radiation-hardened). No discussion of market share gains, competitive differentiation beyond technical features, or pricing power. Competitive position is not assessable as winning or losing—it remains uncertain and dependent on unproven commercialization of edge AI chips.

  • Q4 FY2025 revenue: $5.9 million, up 14% YoY and 9% sequentially
  • FY2025 net loss: $10.6 million, down from $20.1 million in FY2024 (47% improvement)
  • Q4 FY2025 cash and cash equivalents: $13.4 million (down from $14.4 million YoY)
  • Q4 FY2025 gross margin: 56.1%, up from 51.6% YoY and 54% sequentially
  • SBIR funding received to date: $1.6 million, with additional $1 million anticipated
  • Q4 FY2025 sales to KYEC: $1.7 million (29.5% of revenue), up from $544,000 (10.6%) YoY
  • Conversion of initial radiation-hardened SRAM order into follow-on contracts with the North American prime contractor in FY2026
  • Successful heritage status qualification for radiation-hardened SRAM, unlocking high-value sales channels
  • Scaling of Plato chip partnerships leading to joint development funding or commercial licensing deals
  • Receipt of additional $1 million SBIR funding upon program completion, further reducing net R&D spend
  • Winning commercial design wins for Gemini 2 in drone or satellite applications beyond defense
  • Revenue remains highly concentrated, with KYEC alone accounting for 29.5% of Q4 revenue
  • No disclosed TAM, pricing, or volume details for Plato or Gemini 2, limiting visibility on commercial scalability
  • Dependence on non-recurring SBIR government funding to offset R&D expenses (reduced Q4 R&D by $870k)
  • Full-year FY2025 revenue declined 6% YoY despite Q4 growth, indicating inconsistent demand
  • Cash position decreased YoY to $13.4 million, with no new funding secured beyond existing SBIR and asset sale gains
  • No clear path to profitability; operating loss was $10.8M for FY2025, reliant on cost cuts and one-time gains

The company explicitly positions its Plato and Gemini 2 chips for edge computing, not data centers. Management states Plato is taking LLM and Gen AI capabilities 'to the edge' and contrasts this with data center–centric AI workloads. Gemini 2 is discussed in the context of drones, satellites, and edge-based SAR and object detection—use cases that are decentralized and low-power. There is no mention of data center deployments, hyperscaler engagement beyond preliminary discussions, or any product adaptation for server or cloud infrastructure. Any data-center impact is speculative and absent from management’s commentary; the focus is squarely on edge AI, autonomous agents, and defense edge applications.

  • What is the expected timeline, volume, and gross margin profile for follow-on radiation-hardened SRAM orders from the North American prime contractor?
  • Has the company secured any non-government, commercial partnerships or funding for Plato development beyond preliminary discussions?
  • What specific milestones must be met to receive the additional $1 million in SBIR funding, and when is it expected?
  • Beyond KYEC, what is the diversification plan for reducing customer concentration in high-density SRAM sales?
  • What are the defined criteria for 'heritage status' with the radiation-hardened SRAM customer, and what is the probability and timeline of achieving it?
  • What is the company’s plan to achieve sustainable profitability, given that FY2025 operating loss remained at $10.8 million despite cost cuts and one-time gains?

FY2025 Q4 earnings call transcript

21,755 chars
NASDAQ:GSIT Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Generated on 6/6/2026 Conference Call Operator | Call Moderator: Welcome to GSI Technologies fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025 results conference call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session. At that time, we will provide instructions for those interested in entering the queue for the Q&A. Before we begin today's call, the company has requested that I read the following safe harbor statement. The matters discussed in this conference call may include forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future performance of GSI technology that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties are described in the company's Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, I have also been asked to advise you that this conference call is being recorded today, May 1st, 2025, at the request of GSI Technology. Li-Lin Xu, the company's chairman, president, and chief executive officer, will be hosting the call today. With him are Douglas Shirley, chief financial officer, and D.G.L. Assay, vice president of sales. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Xu. Please go ahead, sir. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer: Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us to review our fourth quarter and the fiscal year 2025 financial results. Let's start with a few highlights from fiscal year 2025. We closed the fourth quarter with solid revenue growth, significantly reduced debt loss, and a meaningful improvement in cash burn, finish the year with $13.4 million in cash, and a more disciplined operating structure. Revenue for the fourth quarter increased by 14% year over year, and a 9% sequentially to $5.9 million, driven by strong demand for our essence chip, as we exit this year. This revenue growth and the low operating expense result in a sharp reduction in quantity rate loss and a material decrease in cash usage. For fiscal year 2025, quite annual revenue declined 6% compared to the prior year. we meaningfully reduced our debt loss by 47% from $20.1 million in 2024 to $10.6 million, driven by the 35% reduction in operating expenses. This structural cost improvement is central to our goal of preserving cash and extending our runway. We expect to maintain our quality operating expenses at current levels to minimize our cash burn until we secure new funding sources. In the fourth quarter, we made good progress across multiple funds to advance our technology roadmap and the commercial strategy. Notably, we secured an initial order for radiation hub and X-ray from a North American prime contractor, a key validation of our product. We anticipate follow all orders this fiscal year. This trip carries a significant higher gross margin than all traditional X-rays. EDA is the point person with this customer and will intend further on the opportunities. Our ongoing SBIR programs with government agencies are progressing well, and we are successfully meeting our milestones. Today, our SBIRs have generated a payment total of $1.6 million, and we anticipate receiving an additional $1 million once we complete the program. This quarter, $870,000 was booked as a reduction to RMD expense, further helping to lower operating expenses. We are especially excited about recent enhancement to Prato, adding the integration of a camera interface directly into the chip. This new feature paired with other connectivity enhancements allow the chip to interface with a wide range of sensors. This makes PRATO particularly well-suited for AI agents requiring object recognition. The new capability has increased strategic interest in PRATO, and we are currently in preliminary discussion with multiple parties to scale partnerships and access funds for the next phases of development. Delia will provide more detail on this exciting development. As we look ahead to fiscal year 2026, we plan to build on the progress of our APU development, drive continued growth in excellence sales, and advance execution of our strategic initiatives. across both commercial and the government markets. At the same time, we remain committed to maintain operational efficiency. In parallel, we continue to explore strategic alternatives with a primary focus on securing funding to support the next phase of operator development. We are also working with our banking team to explore other options. that could provide new sources of cash to execute our AS strategy. With that, I will now hand it over to you. D.G.L. Assay | Vice President of Sales: Thank you, Leline. As Leline mentioned, this quarter's primary revenue driver was the continued strong demand for our high-density SRAM. Our SRAM has been deployed in critical systems used in chip manufacturing and the recent uptick in business with KYEC is being driven by surging demand for next generation AI chip from a leading GPU provider. Despite the ongoing tariff negotiations between the US and its trading partners, we currently anticipate the demand from this customer to continue in fiscal year 2026 at a similar level to what we experienced in 2025. With that said, we may have some variability in the timing of the shipments, but importantly, the demand is still anticipated to remain consistent. The big news this quarter is an initial order for our radiation hardened SRAM. While waiting for the forecast from the prime contractor, we anticipate follow-on orders in fiscal 2026. In addition, we are actively working with this customer to secure heritage status. Gaining this status would enhance the market acceptance of our radiation hardened SRAM and unlock access to new high-value sales channels. It is worth noting that radiation-hardened SRAMs carry a gross margin well above those of our traditional SRAM chips, providing a strong financial lever as we work to reduce our net loss and cash burn. Let me switch to Plato and elaborate on Lillian's earlier comments. By integrating a camera interface directly into the chip alongside enhanced connectivity features, Plato significantly broadens its addressable market. Able to process data locally without relying on cloud infrastructure, it's now optimized for edge devices and ideal for agents performing object recognition. To clarify what an agent is, it's helpful to look at how the approach to AI is shifting to agentic AI. These AI systems don't just analyze data, but they also act independently, for example, generating motor commands for a robot or a drone. This involves multiple capabilities that a single-purpose GPU is not well-suited for. Plato, on the other hand, can manage a combination of computing tasks that involve more than just a single number of crunching or graphic workloads. Put another way, agentic AI goes beyond basic data analysis. It must make decisions, process inputs from sensors like cameras and microphones, respond in real time, and take actions in the physical world. In this context, Plato's capabilities position it at the forefront of sectors preparing for significant growth driven by the increasing demand for intelligent, autonomous systems or agents across various industries at the edge. Thus, interest in PLATO has grown among the strategic partners we've engaged with over the past year. Pivoting to our ongoing SBIRs, as Leland stated, these projects are on track and we are meeting the milestones. As a reminder, we are currently working on a Phase II contract from both the Space Development Agency and the Air Force Research Labs, along with our most recently announced Phase I contract with the U.S. Army. As planned, we delivered a server with a LITA-2 board to the Air Force Research Labs and will shortly deliver another LITA-2 board to the Space Development Agency. The Phase 1 SBIR for the U.S. Army contract is evaluating the use of Gemini 2 in edge computing AI solutions, and we are on track to meet all expectations with this partner. This quarter, we also delivered a YOLO algorithm for the Air Force features labs, including the benchmarks for real-time object detection application. We continue to increase the performance of the YOLO algorithms, which can immediately determine the exact placement and identify the type of objects. We plan to deliver the improved YOLO3 and YOLO5 algorithms this summer. Lastly, an update on our STAR projects. We made further progress with an offshore defense R&D customer, which ordered a Gemini 2 system to evaluate the chip's capabilities for low-power in-flight application. We will be shipping this system this quarter. This organization is also a potential funding partner for PLATO. In addition, a U.S. aerospace company continues to evaluate our Gemini for onboard satellite applications. Taken together, these activities support the use of Gemini 2 for integrated edge applications such as SAR generation and drones with subsequent object detection and actionable decisions. Now I will move on to the customer and product breakdowns for the fourth quarter. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, sales to KYEC were 1.7 million, or 29.5% of net revenues. compared to 544,000 or 10.6% of net revenues in the same period a year ago and 1.2 million or 22.7% of net revenues in the prior quarter. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, sales to Nokia were 444,000 or 7.5% of revenues compared to 694,000 or 13.5% of net revenues in the same period a year ago and 239,000 or 4.4% of net revenues in the prior quarter. Military defense sales were 30.7% of fourth quarter shipments compared to 35.5% of shipments in the comparable period a year ago and 30.0% of shipments in the prior quarter. Sigma Quad sales were 39.3% of fourth quarter shipments compared to 42.4% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024 and 39.1% in the prior quarter. I'd now like to hand the call over to Doug. Go ahead, Doug. Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: Beginning with the results for the quarter, we reported net revenues of $5.9 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 compared to $5.2 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. and $5.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2025. Gross margin was 56.1% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 compared to 51.6% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024 and 54% in the preceding third quarter of fiscal 2025. The year-over-year and sequential increase in gross margins was primarily due to higher revenue and product mix. Total operating expenses in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 were $5.6 million compared to $7.2 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024 and $7 million in the prior quarter. Research and development expenses were $3 million compared to $4.8 million in the prior year period and $4 million in the prior quarter. Research and development expenses in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 were reduced by $870,000, reflecting government funding under the SBIR programs. Selling general and administrative expenses were $2.6 million in the quarter ended March 31st, 2025 compared to $2.4 million in the prior year quarter and $3 million in the previous quarter. Fourth quarter fiscal 2025 operating loss was $2.3 million compared to an operating loss of $4.5 million in the prior year period and $4.1 million in the prior quarter. Fourth quarter fiscal 2025 results included interest and other income of $52,000 and a tax provision of $6,000, compared to $108,000 in interest and other income and a tax benefit of $85,000 for the same period a year ago. In the preceding third quarter, net loss included interest and other income of $70,000 and a tax provision of $44,000. Net loss in the fourth quarter fiscal 2025 was $2.2 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $4.3 million, or $0.17 per diluted share in the fourth quarter fiscal 2024, and a net loss of $4 million, or $0.16 per diluted share in the third quarter fiscal 2025. Fourth quarter pre-tax stock-based compensation expense was $512,000, compared to $693,000 in the comparable quarter a year ago, and $429,000 in the prior quarter. Turning now to the full year results for fiscal 2025, we reported net revenues of $20.5 million for fiscal 2025 compared to $21.8 million for fiscal 2024. Gross margin for fiscal 2025 was 49.4% compared to 54.3% in the prior year. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to product mix and the effect of lower revenue on a fixed cost on our cost of revenues. Total operating expenses were $21 million in fiscal 25 compared to $32.3 million in fiscal 2024. Research and development expenses of $16 million compared to $21.7 million in the prior fiscal year. Selling general and administrative expenses were $10.8 million compared to $10.6 million in fiscal 2024. The decline in research and development expenses was primarily due to cost reductions announced in August 2024. Research and development expense in fiscal 2024 included pre-production mass costs of $2.4 million related to our APU2 product. Research and development expenses in 2025 and fiscal 2024 were reduced by $1.2 million and $440,000 respectively. reflecting government funding under the SPIR programs. Operating expenses in fiscal 2025 include a gain on the sale of assets of $5.8 million from the sales of the company's headquarters building in Sunnyvale, California in a sales and leaseback transaction. The operating loss for fiscal 2025 was $10.8 million compared to an operating loss of $20.4 million in the prior year. The fiscal 2025 net loss included interest and other income of $326,000 and a tax provision of $130,000 compared to $414,000 in interest and other income and a tax provision of $70,000 in the prior year. For the fiscal year ended March 31st, 2025, we reported net loss of $10.6 million or 42 cents per diluted share compared to net loss of $20.1 million or 80 cents per diluted share. in the prior fiscal year. On March 31, 2025, we had $13.4 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $14.4 million on March 31, 2024. Working capital was $16.4 million as of March 31, 2025 versus $24.7 million at March 31, 2024. Stockholders' equity as of March 31, 2025 was $28.2 million compared to $36 million as of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024. Unidentified\ Operator, at this point, we'll open the call to Q&A. Conference Call Operator | Call Moderator: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star and 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star and 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a moment while we poll for questions. Conference Call Moderator | Question Facilitator: Our first question comes from the line of Michael Cooper, private investor. Conference Call Operator | Call Moderator: Please go ahead. Michael Cooper | Private Investor: Good evening. Can you talk a little bit about the market for the Plato chip and the Gemini 2 chip? How large are these markets? How do they scale over what time period? Just give us a sense for that. Robert Christian | Investor, Acoustic Technologies: the market conditions here? Michael Cooper | Private Investor: Thank you. D.G.L. Assay | Vice President of Sales: Sure. So we haven't actually put out the TAM numbers yet, but just to talk about the markets. For the Gemini 2, think of it as an extension of Gemini 1, but for the edge. And so Gemini 1 was really to illustrate our capabilities in search and also some high-performance computing applications like SAR. And so what Gemini 2 will do, we'll take that but take it to the edge. Gemini 1 was not built to be a low-power solution with the accompanying FPGA that we've talked about in the past. With the Gemini 2, we can get closer to the edge. So we're looking for, while Gemini 1 would do SAR applications on ground level in a building, we are now looking at Gemini 2 to do a SAR application actually on a drone or on a satellite at the edge. And so we're looking at search and high-performance computing at the edge for Gemini 2. For Plato, this is going to be, it's not going to be for the search market. It's going to be for the LLM market. And so when most folks think about, you know, large language models and Gen AI, they think of it in the data center. We're taking that capability to the edge. And so this, think of Gen AI and LLM models more at the edge. Conference Call Moderator | Question Facilitator: Thank you. Thanks, Michael. Michael, does that answer your question? Michael Cooper | Private Investor: Yes, it does. Thank you. Yeah, that's it. Thank you very much. Conference Call Operator | Call Moderator: Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Robert Christian with Acoustic Technologies. Please go ahead. Robert Christian | Investor, Acoustic Technologies: Yeah, thanks for taking my call. I was wondering, is the company experiencing any interest in the Gemini 2 standalone chip from commercial companies other than, say, the military? And is the company still working with the hyperscalers? Thank you. Conference Call Moderator | Question Facilitator: So, good question. D.G.L. Assay | Vice President of Sales: Honestly, the majority of the early interest have come from more of the middle defense type of applications. and they are looking at it on a component level as well. So we do have what we call the LIDA2 board, which I discussed a little earlier, that we have delivered and will be delivering to some of our partners. And so with the board, we're delivering it with a SOAR algorithm or some kind of a YOLO algorithm that's been developed, which is why they're getting a card. but some of the folks that we have been having discussions with, they are looking for a chip only because they will be mounting it on a drone or in a satellite. One of our other integrating partners that we've discussed in the past, they're actually going to be developing their own miniaturized board, and so they will be procuring just the Gemini 2 chips from us. to put on their proprietary board. So the answer is yes, we are seeing interest on the chip level, but there's also some board level interest as well. Robert Christian | Investor, Acoustic Technologies: Okay, how about the hyperscalers? D.G.L. Assay | Vice President of Sales: Yeah, the hyperscalers, we're really focusing more on the edge right now, and so we have bad discussions with them. It's just that's a longer process with those folks. We find that with the military folks, it's just a much quicker path to revenue. Robert Christian | Investor, Acoustic Technologies: Okay. Can you share with the shareholders a little more detail, if you can, on what Needham is bringing to the table? Unidentified\ Well, you know, really nothing is off the table at this point. Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: You know, it could be sale of assets. It could be, you know, funding into the company, you know, It could be helping us with opportunities for R&D funding, help us with development of products. Unidentified\ It really could be just about anything. Robert Christian | Investor, Acoustic Technologies: Okay, but you can't share any specifics at this time, then? Unidentified\ There's nothing specific to talk about at this time yet. Okay, thank you. Conference Call Operator | Call Moderator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Cooper, who's an investor. Please go ahead. Michael Cooper | Private Investor: Actually, I'm sorry. The last part of that last question answered my question, which was what has Needham actually presented as options or opportunities for you? And it doesn't sound like they've done an awful lot there. Unidentified\ There have been things that we've looked at, but nothing's resulted in anything yet or nothing to talk about. Conference Call Moderator | Question Facilitator: Great. Thank you. Thank you. Conference Call Operator | Call Moderator: A reminder to all the participants, if you wish to ask a question, please press star and 1 on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from the line of Jeff Bernstein with Silver Bernstein Capital. Please go ahead. Robert Christian | Investor, Acoustic Technologies: Yeah, just a quick one. Could you give us what cash flow from operations was in the quarter and what your capex was? Unidentified\ I don't have it for the quarter, but I have cash flow for the year. Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: For the year, cash used in operating operations Unidentified\ Activities would be about $12.9 million. Okay. Conference Call Moderator | Question Facilitator: And what was CapEx for the year? Unidentified\ Very little. Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: Fixed asset additions during the year were, you know, like $45,000. Very little. Very minor. We're not looking at fixed asset acquisitions right now. Conference Call Operator | Call Moderator: Okay. That's great. Thank you. Thank you. As there are no further questions, I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Hsu for closing remarks. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer: Thank you all for joining us. We look forward to speaking with you again when we report our first quarter physical 2026. Thank you. Conference Call Operator | Call Moderator: Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation. jsPDF 3.0.3 D:20260606090142-00'00'

Research summary and source transcript

readyJun 10, 2026

GSI Technology reported modest Q3 FY2025 revenue growth of 2% YoY to $5.4 million, with sequential improvement of 19%, driven by cost reductions and strength in its 'excellent' segment, particularly the 144-meg S1 product. Gross margin improved sequentially to 54% from 38.6% in Q2 FY2025 due to higher revenue, product mix, and prior-quarter workforce reductions, though it remains below the 55.9% from Q3 FY2024. Operating losses narrowed to $4.1 million from $6.7 million YoY, reflecting ongoing expense discipline, but the company remains unprofitable and dependent on strategic alternatives and government funding for its APU and PLATO initiatives.

Management knows today that the PLATO chip, designed for low-power LLM and edge AI applications, is in active development with discussions underway with potential customers who may also serve as funding sources, targeting a 12- to 18-month development timeline. This positions PLATO as a potential strategic pivot from the more complex and costly 3D Gemini 3, leveraging Gemini 2 architecture for faster, cost-effective market entry. The market likely does not yet know whether these discussions will materialize into funded partnerships or customer commitments, or if PLATO can deliver on its promise of data center-level performance at ultra-low power, which would be critical for competitiveness in the edge AI and LLM inference markets over the next 6-24 months.

Revenue growth in the 'excellent' segment (driven by S1 product demand), gross margin expansion via product mix and cost control, and progress in government-funded APU development (Gemini 2 and PLATO) via SBIR programs and strategic partnerships.

  • Progress on Gemini 2 development and upcoming tapeout/availability milestones
  • Strategic shift to PLATO as a lower-cost, faster path to market for LLM and edge AI applications
  • Expansion of government business through SBIR programs with Air Force, Space Development Agency, and U.S. Army
  • Cost reduction initiatives and operating expense discipline
  • Use of Needham & Company to evaluate strategic alternatives
  • Customer and product mix shifts, particularly declining Nokia sales and evolving defense sales mix
  • Didier Le Serre emphasized PLATO’s ability to 'deliver data center performance levels using very low power' as a distinguishing feature for LLM and edge markets
  • Li-Lin Xu highlighted the 144-meg S1 product’s growing demand from a customer expected to become the largest S1 customer in FY2025
  • Didier noted ongoing progress in SAR projects with Asian Defense and R&D organization and two aerospace companies evaluating Gemini 2 for image creation and satellite applications
  • Didier expressed confidence in meeting SBIR milestones, including YOLO algorithm delivery for Air Force Research Labs in the current quarter
  • Li-Lin Xu cited 'meaningful progress in financial performance' and 'ongoing initiative with the APU' as grounds for encouragement

Management exhibited a cautiously optimistic tone, balancing acknowledgment of financial improvements with measured enthusiasm for long-term APU and PLATO initiatives. Executives avoided overpromising on near-term results, instead emphasizing milestone-based progress in government programs and technical development. Their discussion of strategic alternatives was deliberate and non-defensive, responding to investor skepticism about Needham & Company without evasion. Overall, tone was credible and grounded in verifiable milestones rather than speculative hype.

  • No clear dodged analyst question was detected by the local fallback; manual review should still check whether Q&A answers quantified conversion, margins, and guidance.
  • No clear goalpost move was detected by the local fallback; the main follow-up is whether future quarters keep the same KPIs and conversion targets.

The company’s competitive position is not assessable from the transcript. While GSI highlights differentiated technology in Gemini 2 and PLATO for low-power AI and SAR applications, there is no evidence of market share gains, customer wins beyond government SBIRs, or direct comparison to competitors in the edge AI or LLM inference markets. Progress remains largely internal and grant-dependent, with no indication of commercial traction or competitive advantage in volume production.

  • Q3 FY2025 revenue: $5.4 million (up 2% YoY, up 19% sequentially)
  • Q3 FY2025 gross margin: 54% (down from 55.9% in Q3 FY2024, up from 38.6% in Q2 FY2025)
  • Q3 FY2025 operating loss: $4.1 million (improved from $6.7 million in Q3 FY2024 and $5.6 million in Q2 FY2025)
  • Q3 FY2025 net loss: $4 million ($0.16 per diluted share)
  • Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2024: $15.1 million (up from $14.4 million as of March 31, 2024)
  • U.S. Army Phase I SBIR contract: $250,000, with potential Phase II up to $2 million
  • Space Development Agency SBIR: 45% of $1.25 million received ($562,500), balance due upon Gemini 2 board delivery
  • Successful tapeout of Gemini 2 in February and availability in May, enabling algorithm development and library building for Air Force SBIR delivery by Q3 calendar 2025
  • Potential follow-on Phase II awards from U.S. Army SBIR (up to $2 million) after Phase I completion, contingent on feasibility assessment and algorithm validation
  • Advancement in SAR evaluations with Asian Defense and R&D organization and two aerospace companies, which could lead to board purchases and funding partnerships for PLATO
  • Completion of PLATO development within 12-18 months, if funded, positioning it for entry into growing LLM and edge AI markets
  • Continued gross margin expansion if product mix shifts toward higher-margin S1 and APU-related products
  • Resolution of strategic alternatives process with Needham & Company, potentially unlocking non-dilutive funding or partnership
  • PLATO development remains unfunded and dependent on securing strategic or financial partners, with no guarantee of success
  • Gemini 2 and PLATO timelines are subject to technical delays, particularly given the manual bug in Gemini 2 first silicon requiring software work-arounds
  • Revenue remains heavily concentrated and volatile, with Nokia sales declining sharply (from 15.2% to 4.4% of net revenue YoY)
  • Government SBIR funding is incremental and milestone-dependent; failure to meet deliverables risks loss of future funding
  • Operating losses persist despite improvements, and path to profitability is not yet demonstrated
  • Strategic alternatives process may not yield a transaction, leaving the company to fund APU development internally amid limited cash reserves

GSI’s PLATO chip is explicitly designed to deliver data center performance levels at ultra-low power for edge and LLM applications, suggesting an indirect but strategic intent to compete in AI inference markets where data center efficiency is paramount. However, there is no evidence in the transcript of current data center deployments, direct sales to hyperscalers, or partnerships with cloud providers. The impact is speculative and contingent on PLATO’s successful development and customer adoption, with no near-term data center revenue contribution indicated.

  • What is the current status of funding discussions for the $50 million PLATO development program, and which potential customers or partners have expressed concrete interest?
  • What specific milestones must be met to trigger the potential $2 million Phase II award from the U.S. Army SBIR, and what is the expected timeline for Phase I completion?
  • Beyond the 144-meg S1, what are the revenue contributions and growth trends from other products in the 'excellent' segment, and is the S1 customer concentration a risk?
  • What are the gross margin implications of the current product mix, and how sustainable is the sequential margin improvement given the prior-quarter workforce reductions?
  • What is the expected timeline for Gemini 2 tapeout, availability, and delivery of the YOLO algorithm to Air Force Research Labs, and are there any known technical risks remaining?
  • How does PLATO’s power efficiency and performance compare to existing edge AI accelerators from competitors, and what validation has been done to support the claim of 'data center performance levels'?

FY2025 Q3 earnings call transcript

14,141 chars
NASDAQ:GSIT Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Generated on 6/6/2026 Operator | Conference Host: Welcome to GSI Technologies' third quarter fiscal 2025 results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session. At that time, we will provide instructions for those interested in entering the queue for the Q&A. Before we begin today's call, the company has requested that I read the following safe harbor statement. The matters discussed in this conference call may include forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future performance of GSI technology that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties are described in the company's Form 10-K, followed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, I have also been asked to advise you that this conference call is being recorded today, January 30, 2025, at the request of GSI Technologies. Li-Lin Xu, the company's chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, will be hosting the call today. With him are Douglas Shirley, Chief Financial Officer, and Didier Le Serre, Vice President of Sales. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Hsu. Please go ahead, sir. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer: Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us to review our third quarter, fiscal 2025 financial results. And I am pleased to report that our third quarter demonstrated meaningful progress in our financial performance and the ongoing initiative with the APU. Let me start with our financial highlights before diving into our product development. In the third quarter, we generated revenue of $5.4 million, representing a 2% increase year-over-year and a 19% sequential growth from the previous quarter. More importantly, our cost reduction initiative has begun to bear fruit, resulting in a reduction in operating and debt losses compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2024. Looking at our excellent business, I am encouraged by the continued momentum in our core excellent segment. Revenue growth this quarter in excellent came from existing customers, resuming over at their inventory level overnight, and the growing demand from the customer for our 144-meg S1, whose systems are equal to manufacturing-leading AI chips. We anticipate this customer becoming our largest S1 customer in fiscal year 2025. Let me share a few key developments on the APU front. So far, our APU technology is progressing steadily. We made good progress using the Gemini 2 first silicon, which had a manual bug. Fortunately, software work-along made the chip sufficiently functional to put on the board for testing and software and library development. We will be able to deliver new known network models for our Gemini 2 SBIR program with the Air Force in the March quarter based on this first silicon. We are now preparing for a second spin of Gemini 2 for mass production. EDL will provide additional details on Gemini 2 in his prepared comments. In parallel, we have begun work on a new chip, PLATO will be designed to address the growing market for large language models in AI applications as a solution with its low-power features. The chip architecture will be built on Gemini 2's architecture. We are pursuing multiple funding pathways to support this $50 million development program, including discussions with strategic and financial partners. Our government business continues to expand to multiple SBIR programs. We recently announced a phase one contract with the U.S. Army, securing $250,000. In this phase, we will explore and identify best fit applications to develop specialized edge computing AI solutions with Gemini 2. This will strengthen our relationship with agencies within the Department of Defense. GDL will share more details on this new win and the status of our sub-projects. In summary, while we are encouraged by our progress, we remain dedicated to disciplined execution across all areas. Our improved operating efficiency, growing S&S sales, and strategic initiatives in commercial and government market positions as well for sustainable growth as we continue to create strategic alternatives. With that, I'll hand it over to Didier to provide more details on our APU business opportunities and cover the third quarter sales breakdown. Didier Le Serre | Vice President of Sales: Thank you, Lilien. As Leline mentioned, Gemini 2 is on track for a February tapeout and availability in May and will have a new leaderboard in June. This aligns with the milestone for the Air Force's SBIR. Gemini 2 enhances AI capabilities with neural network models together with SAR imaging capability to target high-value applications in the defense and aerospace markets. Meeting these milestones should put us in a good shape to complete algorithm development and library building for delivery by third quarter of calendar 2025. Leveraging Gemini 2's architecture, we can accelerate the development of our next generation chip, PLATO, with a cost-effective, faster-to-market strategy. PLATO's ultra-low power design will target rapidly growing markets for the edge and large language model solutions. PLATO is a strategic pivot from our previous plan for developing a new next generation version of Gemini with a more economical and faster development path than the previously proposed 3D Gemini 3. The distinguishing feature of PLATO targeted for LLM market is that it can deliver data center performance levels using very low power, making it suitable for use at the edge. As Eileen mentioned, we are in discussions with potential customers who could be initial users and may also be funding sources with an expected development timeline of 12 to 18 months. I am pleased to say that our ongoing SBIR projects are on track and meeting our milestones. As a reminder, we are currently working on Phase II contracts with Space Development Agency and Air Force Research Labs and most recently announced a Phase I contract with the U.S. Army. We are preparing to deliver a YOLO algorithm for the Air Force Research Labs in the current quarter, including the benchmarks for a real-time object detection application. As a reminder, YOLO, which stands for You Only Look Once, are algorithms that immediately determine the exact placement of objects in an image by drawing boxes around them and identifying the types of object. Our second SBIR with the Space Development Agency is waiting for the delivery of a Gemini 2 board. As I mentioned earlier, we are on track to deliver this within the required timeframe. Today, we have received 45% of the $1.25 million contract and will receive the balance upon the board's delivery. We are now executing the phase one for our latest win, the U.S. Army contract. to determine which of their ongoing projects would benefit from Gemini 2's capabilities. After phase one, we will have the opportunity to compete for phase two, which could be worth up to $2 million. The focus will be on edge computing AI solutions using Gemini 2. Our key objectives are integration, feasibility assessment, and AI algorithm validation for military applications. The Army is the largest of the five branches of the Department of Defense, and with this SBIR, we are gaining exposure to this branch. Lastly, regarding our SAR projects, there has been ongoing progress in fiscal Q3. The Asian Defense and R&D organization that we have mentioned in the past is evaluating Gemini 2 for low power in-flight applications. We are advancing with a few more deliverables to prepare them to purchase a Gemini 2 board. This organization is also a potential funding partner for PLATO. Also, two other aerospace companies are evaluating our technology for image creation and onboard satellite applications for SAR. Now I'll move to the customer and product breakdowns for the third quarter. In the third quarter of fiscal 2025, sales to Nokia were 239,000, or 4.4% of net revenues, compared to 807,000 or 15.2% of net revenues in the same period a year ago and 812,000 or 17.8% of net revenues in the prior quarter. Military defense sales were 25% of our third quarter shipments compared to 28.2% of shipments in the comparable period a year ago and 40.2% of shipments in the prior quarter. Sigma quad sales were 39.1% of third quarter shipments compared to 46.9% in the third quarter of fiscal 2024 and 38.6% in the prior quarter. Now I'd like to hand the call over to Doug. Go ahead, Doug. Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: We reported net revenues of $5.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 compared to $5.3 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2024 and $4.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2025. Gross margin was 54% in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 compared to 55.9% in the third quarter of fiscal 2024 and 38.6% in the preceding second quarter of fiscal 2025. The sequential increase in gross margin in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 was primarily due to higher revenue, products mix, and severance costs associated with manufacturing workforce reductions in the prior quarter. Total operating expenses in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 were $7 million compared to $9.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2024 and $7.3 million in the prior quarter. Research and development expenses were $4 million compared to $7 million in the prior year period and $4.8 million in the prior quarter. Selling general and administrative expenses were $3 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2024 compared to $2.7 million in the prior year quarter and $2.6 million in the previous quarter. Third quarter fiscal 2025 operating loss was $4.1 million compared to an operating loss of $6.7 million in the prior year period and $5.6 million in the prior quarter. Third quarter fiscal 2025 net loss included interest and other income of $70,000 and a tax provision of $44,000 compared to $155,000 in interest and other income and a tax provision of $71,000 for the same period a year ago. In the preceding second quarter, net loss included interest and other income of $149,000 and a tax provision of $23,000. Net loss in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 was $4 million, or 16 cents per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $6.6 million, or 26 cents per diluted share, for the third quarter fiscal 2024, and a net loss of $5.5 million, or 21 cents per diluted share, for the second quarter fiscal 2025. Total third quarter pre-tax stock-based compensation expense was $429,000, compared to $649,000 in the comparable quarter a year ago, and $663,000 in the prior quarter. December 31st, 2024, the company had $15.1 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $14.4 million at March 31st, 2024. Working capital was $17.9 million as of December 31st, 2024 versus $19.1 million at March 31st, 2024. Stockholders' equity as of December 31st, 2024 was $29.9 million compared to $36 million as as of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024. Previously, we announced that the company had initiated a comprehensive strategic review and established a special committee of the Board to evaluate various strategic alternatives. We continue to work with Needham & Company as our strategic and financial advisor to assist in this process. Operator, at this point, we will open the call to Q&A. Operator | Conference Host: Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate a line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 to remove yourself from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up the handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, Nicole, for a question. Our first question comes from the line of Robert Christian, a private investor. Please proceed with your question. Robert Christian | Private Investor: Yes, I'd like to know, is the company utilizing AI to do its algorithms and software? And are we going to get a white paper on the benchmarks for the Gemini 2? Didier Le Serre | Vice President of Sales: So the algorithms, we're actually writing ourselves with the folks that we have in our Israeli division. As far as a white paper, yes. So as we mentioned, the first algorithm on Gemini 2 will be the YOLO model, specifically YOLO 3. We will also be following that up with the YOLO 5, but we will be publishing benchmarks when that's done, correct. Robert Christian | Private Investor: Okay, and a second question I have was when Needham was brought on or was announced back last year in May, it was to enhance the company valuation system. We're actually lower now than we were. Are they the right partner? Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: Well, you know, we've been working with them, and they have brought us opportunities that we've been looking at, and we continue to look at opportunities. I don't know that it's fair to say that they were brought in to increase the company's valuation. The intent was to find strategic alternatives to further grow the company and provide investment into the company. Robert Christian | Private Investor: Well, I was almost positive that's what was stated in May. I could be wrong, but anyway, thank you very much. Didier Le Serre | Vice President of Sales: Thank you, Christian. Operator | Conference Host: Thank you. Again, as a reminder, if anyone has any questions, you may press star 1 to join the Q&A. And it looks like there are no further questions. Therefore, I will turn the call back over to Lili and Shu for closing remarks. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer: Thank you all for joining us. We look forward to speaking with you again when we report our fourth quarter and the full year of fiscal 2025 in town. Thank you. Operator | Conference Host: Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation. jsPDF 3.0.3 D:20260606090143-00'00'

Research summary and source transcript

readyJun 10, 2026

GSI Technology reported Q2 FY2025 revenue of $4.6 million, down from $5.7 million year-over-year, with gross margin declining to 38.6% from 54.7% due to product mix and severance costs. Management highlighted a new SRAM design win with a major AI chipmaker as a potential growth driver, alongside progress on SBIR contracts and APU roadmap initiatives including Gemini 2L and Plato for edge LLM inference. While cost-cutting aims to generate $3.5 million in annualized savings, the business remains unprofitable with no clear path to sustained revenue growth or margin expansion.

Management knows today that the new SRAM design with the unnamed AI chipmaker customer is ramping in volume and is expected to become the company's top customer in the near future, a development not yet reflected in public filings or analyst models. This customer relationship, tied to high-volume AI chip production, represents a potential step-change in revenue visibility that the market may not fully appreciate for 6-24 months until shipment volumes scale and appear in quarterly results.

Revenue growth is driven by SRAM sales to AI-related semiconductor equipment customers, government-funded SBIR contracts for edge AI/ML applications, and defense SAR engagements; gross margin is influenced by product mix (high-margin SRAM vs. lower-margin custom ASICs) and operating leverage from fixed R&D and SG&A bases.

  • New SRAM design win with major AI chipmaker as a near-term top customer
  • Progress on SBIR contracts including YOLO model delivery and DOD edge board negotiations
  • APU roadmap: Gemini 2 benchmarking, Gemini 2L low-power variant, and Plato for edge LLM inference
  • Cost restructuring targeting $3.5 million in annualized savings
  • Inventory correction at existing customers leading to future order resumption
  • SAR applications with two defense/aerospace customers advancing to Gemini 2 evaluation
  • Didier Le Serre emphasized 'exceptional' interest in the new AI chip and 'substantial demand' expected from the SRAM opportunity
  • Li-Lin Xu highlighted being 'much further ahead' on Gemini 2 software development versus Gemini 1
  • Didier noted the SRAM customer will 'certainly' exceed 10% of revenue and become the 'number one customer in the near future'
  • Management expressed confidence in executing the APU roadmap despite resource constraints
  • Didier pointed to leveraging SBIR wins to fund Gemini 2 and Plato development

Management displayed cautious optimism, balancing acknowledgment of near-term challenges (declining revenue, margin pressure, losses) with specific, measurable progress on growth initiatives. Language was direct when discussing financials and timelines, but evasive on customer details. Credibility was supported by quantifiable milestones (e.g., SBIR deadlines, savings targets) and consistency in discussing roadmap progression, though excitement around the AI chip opportunity occasionally veered toward promotional without volumetric specifics.

  • Jeff Bernstein's question about whether the SRAM opportunity is for semi-equipment or test equipment was deflected by Didier Le Serre stating they 'don't want to give too much detail' and 'don't want to name our customer', despite the analyst's attempt to clarify the end market.
  • Management shifted focus from Gemini 1 to Gemini 2 and its low-power variant (Gemini 2L) as the current SAR evaluation platform, effectively moving the benchmark from the original Gemini 1 to a newer version without acknowledging prior delays.
  • The introduction of 'Plato' as a new APU for edge LLM inference appears to reframe the APU roadmap beyond the previously discussed Gemini series, potentially shifting emphasis from completed milestones to future-stage development.

The company appears to be in a nascent competitive position with a potential first-mover advantage in supplying SRAM to a major AI chipmaker's semiconductor manufacturing process, but this is unproven at scale. In defense and SBIR markets, GSI is participating in evaluations but has not yet secured production orders. Without evidence of market share gains, customer wins beyond single engagements, or margin improvement, competitive positioning remains uncertain and dependent on execution of near-term catalysts.

  • Q2 FY2025 revenue: $4.6 million (vs. $5.7 million YoY, $4.7 million QoQ)
  • Q2 FY2025 gross margin: 38.6% (vs. 54.7% YoY, 46.3% QoQ)
  • Q2 FY2025 net loss: $5.4 million ($0.21 per diluted share)
  • Cash and cash equivalents: $18.4 million as of September 30, 2024 (vs. $14.4 million March 31, 2024)
  • Annualized savings target from restructuring: $3.5 million
  • Nokia sales: $812,000 (17.8% of Q2 FY2025 revenue)
  • Military defense sales: 40.2% of Q2 FY2025 shipments
  • Sigma Quad sales: 38.6% of Q2 FY2025 shipments
  • SRAM shipments to AI chipmaker customer scaling to become top customer
  • Completion of Gemini 2 benchmarking and SBIR deliverables by end of 2024
  • Finalization of new DOD edge board SBIR contract within next month
  • Resume of orders from existing customers after channel inventory depletion
  • Progress on Plato APU for edge LLM inference with detailed plans expected in Q3 call
  • SAR customer advancements to Gemini 2 and Gemini 2L evaluations for flight/satellite use
  • Revenue remains dependent on a single unnamed AI chipmaker customer for future growth
  • Gross margin pressure from product mix and one-time severance costs may persist
  • Operating losses continue despite cost cuts, with no near-term profitability guidance
  • SBIR contract funding is uncertain and subject to negotiation delays
  • APU roadmap execution (Gemini 2L, Plato) is early-stage and resource-constrained
  • Customer concentration risk: Nokia declined from 20.3% to 17.8% YoY; no other customer exceeds 10% yet

The transcript contains no direct evidence of data center exposure. The SRAM opportunity is tied to semiconductor manufacturing equipment for AI chip production, not data center deployment. While the end use of the AI chips includes large language model training/inference, GSI's components are sold to fabrication equipment makers, not data center operators. Any data center impact is indirect and speculative, contingent on the success of the AI chips made using GSI's SRAM in manufacturing tools.

  • What is the expected quarterly revenue ramp from the new AI chipmaker SRAM customer, and when will it exceed 25% of total revenue?
  • What specific product mix changes are causing gross margin pressure, and is there a plan to restore margins to historical 50%+ levels?
  • When will the company achieve positive EBITDA, and what are the key assumptions behind the $3.5 million annualized savings target?
  • What is the status of the DOD edge board SBIR contract negotiation, and what are the deliverables and timeline if awarded?
  • How many units of Gemini 2 have been shipped or evaluated by SAR customers, and what is the conversion rate from evaluation to production order?
  • What is the power, performance, and area (PPA) comparison of Plato versus competing edge LLM inference solutions, and what customer engagements exist beyond internal development?

FY2025 Q2 earnings call transcript

15,549 chars
NASDAQ:GSIT Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Generated on 6/6/2026 Operator | Conference Call Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to GSI Technology's second quarter fiscal 2025 results conference call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. At that time, we will provide instructions for those interested in entering the queue for the Q&A. Before we begin today's call, the company has requested that I read the following safe harbor statements. The matters discussed in this conference call may include forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future performance of GSI technology that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties are described in the company's form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, I've also been asked to advise you that this conference call is being recorded today, October 24, 2024, Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer: at the request of GSI Technology. Li-Lin Xu, the company's Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, will be hosting the call today. Operator | Conference Call Operator: With him are Douglas Shirley, Chief Financial Officer, and Didier Le Serre, Vice President of Sales. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Xu. Please go ahead, sir. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer: Good afternoon. and thank you for joining us to review our second quarter physical 2025 financial results. We are starting to see a significant turnaround in our excellent business this quarter, driven by two key factors. First, existing customers are actively depleting their channel inventories, and we anticipate They will resume orders in the upcoming quarters. Second, we have secured a new SM design with significant growth potential. Our longstanding partnership with the provider in the semiconductor manufacturing process is yielding significant demand related to a new AI chip. Didier will cover this exciting development in more detail in his comments. I want to update you on our Phase 1 and 2 SBIR contracts. We are on track to meet the deadline for the Gemini 2 benchmarking project and fulfill our SBIR contract with the U.S. Air Force Research Lab by December 31, 2024, followed by the delivery of the software algorithm in the first quarter of calendar 2025. Didier will turn further on our SBIR opportunities in his comments. Switching now to the APU development, we remain on track to meet our milestones on Gemini 2, including the benchmarking, which will be completed by the end of this year. We are excited that we have software fixes for the bugs in the first game of Gemini 2. This means we are much further ahead on the Gemini 2 software development and the library building at this stage than we were with Gemini 1. Lastly, on the APU roadmap, we are in the early stage of hardware development of a potential APU for use with LLM, which we named Plato. On our third quarter earning conference call, I will provide more detailed plans for this product and its potential applications. However, I want to ensure stakeholders, now that we have a roadmap beyond Gemini 1 and 2 for the APU, that we can execute given the company's resources. In previous calls, I discussed our external opportunities, extra opportunities, Two companies are currently using the APU for SAR applications, and both projects are progressing well. This year will give an update on the current status of this engagement. For the fiscal second quarter, we reported revenue of $4.6 million, in line with our guidance. Our gross margin was under pressure this quarter due to the mix of products and non-recurring surveillance costs related to workforce reduction in manufacturing. During the quarter, we introduced strategic cost-cutting measures to extend our financial runway and capitalize on our immediate and long-term opportunities. This action, including workforce reduction across all departments and enhanced operational efficiency, our project to generate annualized savings of about $3.5 million. We take this restructuring initiative and improve as an revenue outlook to reduce our cash burn significantly. Now, I will hand the call over to Didier, who will discuss our business performance further. Please go ahead, Didier. Didier Le Serre | Vice President of Sales: Thank you, Lillian. Let me start with the new SRAM opportunity that Leline mentioned earlier. Our customer system is used to manufacture our leading AI chip developers' top-selling chip and their newly released chip. Volumes, shipments of our 144 megabit SRAM to this customer began at the start of calendar 2024, coinciding with an increase in the forecast for its product used in AI chip that is coming online. Demand for their product has been rising along the rapidly growing need for the top-selling and newly launched chips for the leading AI chip maker, fueled by the growth in high-performance computing hardware. Looking ahead, we anticipate even greater demand due to indications for a newly released chip requiring a higher capacity of this manufacturing product for this next-generation chip production needs. Interest in this new AI chip has been exceptional as leading tech companies compete to deliver the best hardware for their large language model platforms. We expect our collaboration with this customer to drive substantial demand for our SRAM chips. This customer is now positioned to become our number one customer in the near future. In addition, we have two other large existing customers that have worked through excessive inventory and we anticipate this will increase SRAM orders in the future quarters. Let me switch to recap our SBIR work. We are still working through the milestones of the two SBIRs that we previously were granted. As a reminder, these were the 1.25 million and the 1.1 million, respectively. For the 1.1 million grant, we aim to deliver a YOLO3 and YOLO5 model within four months that can be used for any real-time object detection application. If you are unfamiliar with the acronym YOLO, it stands for You Only Look Once. YOLO models are real-time object detection algorithms that immediately determine where objects are by drawing boxes around them and what those objects are by identifying their types in any image. We are still in contract negotiations on the SBIR. We were awarded last quarter by a new large division of the DOD for an edge board application. We hope to finalize that contract within the next month and begin working on the project deliverables before calendar year end. Before I move on to customer and product breakdown, I want to expand on the SAR opportunities that Leline mentioned. GSI is engaged with two customers on SAR Edge applications that have completed evaluations with Gemini One. Recently, they both began evaluating Gemini Two. Our ongoing SAR engagement with an Asian defense research and development organization is transitioning from evaluating Gemini One to a Gemini Two L. which is a low power version of our Gemini 2. This is intended for an in-flight application using SAR image generation. The project using Gemini 2L has specific applications that better align with the lower power profile needed for this flight application. Another customer, a US aerospace company specializing in SAR technology, is investigating the possibility of using Gemini 2 on a satellite for SAR applications. The company recently requested new benchmarks for a more complex application, which we are in the process of executing now. As Leneen mentioned, we are using the lessons learned from that experience to advance our timeline for Gemini 2. In both cases, we successfully used Gemini 1 to demonstrate the sar capabilities which paved the way for gemini 2 to be evaluated for use as a real-time edge application i'm sorry edge device for these applications we are also leveraging sbir opportunities including ones that we have won to help fund the further development of gemini 2 and plato let me switch now to customer and product breakdowns for the second quarter in the second Quarter of fiscal 2025, sales to Nokia were $812,000 or 17.8% of net revenues compared to $1.2 million or 20.3% of net revenues in the same period a year ago and $998,000 or 21.4% of net revenues in the prior quarter. Military defense sales were 40.2% of second quarter shipments compared to 34.8% of shipments in the comparable period a year ago. and 31.9% of shipments in the prior quarter. Sigma Quad sales were 38.6% of second quarter shipments, compared to 55.8 in the second quarter of fiscal 24, and 36.3% in the prior quarter. I'd now like to hand the call over to Doug. Douglas Shirley | Chief Financial Officer: Go ahead, please. We reported net revenues of $4.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2025. compared to $5.7 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2024 and $4.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Gross margin was 38.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2025 compared to 54.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2024 and 46.3% in the preceding first quarter of fiscal 2025. The decrease in gross margin in the second quarter of 2025 was primarily due to a shift to product mix and non-recurring severance costs associated with manufacturing workforce reductions. Total operating expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2025 were $7.3 million compared to $7.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2024 and $1.1 million in the prior quarter. Prior quarter operating expenses included a gain of $5.7 million related to the sale and leaseback of the company's headquarters. Research and development expenses were $4.8 million compared to $4.7 million in the prior year period and $4.2 million in the prior quarter. Selling general and administrative expenses were $2.6 million in the quarter ended September 30th, 2024, compared to $2.5 million in the prior year quarter and $2.6 million in the previous quarter. Second quarter fiscal 2025 operating loss was $5.6 million compared to an operating loss of $4.1 million in the prior year period and operating income of $1.1 million in the prior quarter. Second quarter fiscal 2025 net income included interest and other income of $149,000 and a tax provision of $23,000 compared to $71,000 in interest and other income and a tax provision of $33,000 for the same period a year ago. In the preceding first quarter, net loss included interest and under income of $55,000 and a tax provision of $57,000. Net loss in the second quarter fiscal 2025 was $5.4 million, or 21 cents per diluted share, compared to net loss of $4.1 million, or 16 cents per diluted share, for the second quarter fiscal 2024. And net income of 1.1 million, or 4 cents per diluted share, inclusive of a one-time gain of $5.7 million on the sale and leaseback transaction related to the sale of the company's headquarters for the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Total second quarter pre-tax stock-based compensation expense was $663,000 compared to $676,000 in the comparable quarter a year ago and $658,000 in the prior quarter. September 30th, 2024, The company had $18.4 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $14.4 million on March 31st, 2024. Working capital was $21.1 million as of September 30th, 2024 versus $19.1 million on March 31st, 2024. Stockholders' equity as of September 30th, 2024 was $33.3 million compared to $36 million as of the fiscal year ended March 31st, 2024. On a prior earnings call this year, we announced that the company had initiated comprehensive strategic review and established a special committee of the board to evaluate specific strategic alternatives. We continue to work with Needham & Company as our strategic and financial advisor to assist in this process. Operator, at this point, we will open the call to Q&A. Operator | Conference Call Operator: Thank you. At this time, we'll be conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer: One moment, please, while we poll for questions. My first question comes from Jeff Bernstein with Silverberg Bernstein. Operator | Conference Call Operator: Please proceed with your question. Jeff Bernstein | Analyst, Silverberg Bernstein: Hi, good afternoon. Question on the S-RAM opportunity. So are you saying that's for a semi-equipment, wasteful fabrication equipment customer or is it a semi-test equipment customer? Didier Le Serre | Vice President of Sales: Along those lines. Yeah, we don't want to give too much detail because right now we don't want to name our customer. I mean, it's been a customer we've had for, many years, but they've never been a 10% customer, so we haven't identified them specifically. You know, that will certainly change in the quarters coming up because they'll exceed that. Jeff Bernstein | Analyst, Silverberg Bernstein: Gotcha. Gotcha. Okay. But it's associated with manufacturing. Okay. And then just on the – various APUs now. So there was mention of something called Cradle. Is that like a low-power version of Gemini 2, or what's Cradle, and what's the L that you referred to, the low-power Gemini 2? Didier Le Serre | Vice President of Sales: Sure. So we have Gemini, as you know. Gemini 2L is a derivative of Gemini 2. It's not a new design. It's just a way that we can configure the die to make it work with one core or two core. If you recall, our Gemini 2, in fact Gemini 1 for that matter, have four cores. And so it's a way for us to limit what's working inside the chip. And so people can use kind of a a smaller variable of the device, which in turn gives them a very low power part. And so that's the Gemini 2L is just a derivative of our existing Gemini 2. PLATO, however, is a new design. And it's going after, you know, a different market. It's going after the LLM market specifically on the edge. And so it'll be very low power as well. You know, if you're familiar with the LLM market today, you know, some of the, folks going after it or going after it with very, very large GPUs that require water cooling, what have you. And so in this case, this is more for edge LLMs, and it would be a low-power solution. Jeff Bernstein | Analyst, Silverberg Bernstein: Gotcha. And that's for inference? Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer: Correct. Gotcha. Okay, that's great. Thanks. I'll let somebody else ask. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. There are no further questions. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back over to management for any closing comments. Li-Lin Xu | Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer: Thank you all for joining us. We look forward to speaking with you again when we report our third quarter physical 2025 results. Thank you. Operator | Conference Call Operator: This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation. jsPDF 3.0.3 D:20260606090144-00'00'